For you Mark Harwood has made a file HighlightExtractorTest in which the principle of work Highlight is specified.
Besides by replacing tags <B> for example on < B style = " color:black; background-color:#ffff66 " >, receive yellow Highlight. If to apply conformity found word and color, it will turn out as at Google and etc.
Best regards,
Vladimir.
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:19:28 +0000 (GMT) Clandes Tino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all, I have incorporated highlighting package
(http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm)
but I am worried about the following issue.
If I want to display "body" field content?s best segments, containing term from query highlighted, I have to define Field "body" as Stored.
So, complete process would be like this:
Index related work:
1. parse uploaded document into temp ASCII file
2. read ASCII file and append its content to String 3. make Field as Text(String name, String value)
Search related work: 1. Retrieve field ?body? String value from the hit (again - only way to do this - as I have understood ? is to declare Field ?body? as Stored) 2. pass the String value to Highlighter methods.
Besides that in Lucene FAQ I have read that ?body? fields are not good candidates to be declared as Stored. Index size is one obvious reason, but I am wondering, how it implies Lucene search performance in general?
Has somebody an idea how to include highlight functionality in Unstored Field?
Regards and thanx in advance
Milan
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
