Has anyone tried comparing the performance of regular (multi-file) indexing and specifying a value for minMergeDocs? Using parameter limits the number of files and is supposed to improve the speed of indexation.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Otis Gospodnetic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:41 PM Subject: Re: Performance: compound vs. multi-file index, indexing and searching > I haven't tested the two in a multi-threaded setup, but my > single-threaded unit test now clearly shows that there _is_ a > consistent indexing performance difference between the two index > structures. The multi-file structure seems to beat the compound index > structure by about 7% in my tests, which matches Hui's report, and what > I thought unit tests would show. > > Hui used Lucene 1.3, and I used the latest RC, and the results are > about the same. > > Otis > > --- Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > > Can anyone comment on performance differences? > > > > I'd expect multi-threaded performance to be a bit worse with the > > compound format, but single-threaded performance should be nearly > > identical. > > > ===== > http://www.simpy.com/ - social bookmarking and personal search engine > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
