Correct, that is what I meant when I said you application will have to handle your particular merge. Instead of using addIndexes method, your applicatoin will have to go through all Documents in the smaller index (the one with cluster fields), get the PK of each Doc, look up that Doc by PK in the big index, delete it from there if it exists, and re-add it to the big index).
Otis --- Albert Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, but with this solution, i cannot perform queries like: > get all codes that match "title:java and language:english and > cluster:0" > > Albert > > > Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > >Aha, now I see what you mean. You didn't mention 'date' before. :) > >So, dates will get preserved, and you will be able to keep using > them > >for sorting. However, Lucene will not automatically recognize your > 'PK > >fields' and merge fields from two Documents with the same PK into a > >single Document. You can think of 'merge' as 'add' (well, the > method > >name is addIndices, actually :)), so Lucene will simply make a > >cumulative index from your two separate indices: > > > >luceneID_0, code_x, title_x, content_x, language_x, date_x > >luceneID_1, code_y, title_y, content_y, language_y, date_y > >luceneID_0, code_y, cluster_y > >luceneID_1, code_x, cluster_x > > > >Otis > > > > > >--- Albert Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>By 'order', I mean that I'm adding the documents in the big index > >>sorted > >>by date (in order to increase the sorting process). I wanna > preserve > >>this sorting after the merging process. > >> > >>I'm not using the internal lucene ID in the code field. The code > >>field > >>contains my own IDs. I was asking, if I can do the merge using my > own > >> > >>IDs (the code field), and not the lucene internal IDs, for example: > >> > >>luceneID_0, code_x, title_x, content_x, language_x, date_x > >>luceneID_1, code_y, title_y, content_y, language_y, date_y > >> > >>luceneID_0, code_y, cluster_y > >>luceneID_1, code_x, cluster_x > >> > >>Will the prevous index structure procude an unconsistent merged > >>index? > >> > >>I wanna achieve the following merged index: > >>luceneID_0, code_x, title_x, content_x, language_x, date_x, > cluster_x > >>luceneID_1, code_y, title_y, content_y, language_y, date_y, > cluster_y > >> > >>Thanks > >> > >>Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Albert, > >>> > >>>--- Albert Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Thanks Otis, but I can merge two indexes with different fields? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Yes. Documents with different Fields can be stored in the same > >>> > >>> > >>index. > >> > >> > >>>Not every Document has to have all fields, and it can even have a > >>>completely different set of Fields. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>My big index has this fields, code, title, content, language and > >>>>date. I add the new documents incrementally. > >>>> > >>>>The clustering index only contains the fields code, and cluster. > >>>>Merging > >>>>the big index with the clustering one will preserve the order of > >>>> > >>>> > >>the > >> > >> > >>>>big one? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>I don't fully understand what you mean by 'order'. If you are > >>> > >>> > >>asking > >> > >> > >>>whether internal document Ids will remain the same, the answer is > >>>negative. If you have deleted some documents, there will be gaps > in > >>>document Id sequence, which Lucene will fill, thus re-assigning > >>>internal document Ids. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>For example, if I have the following indexes: > >>>>Big index > >>>>code_1, title_1, content_1, language_1, date_1 > >>>>code_2, title_2, content_2, language_2, date_2 > >>>>.... > >>>> > >>>>Clustering index > >>>>code_1, cluster_1 > >>>>code_2, cluster_2 > >>>>.... > >>>> > >>>>then the new merged index will be: > >>>> > >>>>Merged index > >>>>code_1, title_1, content_1, language_1, date_1, cluster_1 > >>>>code_2, title_2, content_2, language_2, date_2, cluster_2 > >>>>.... > >>>> > >>>>If I can do that then fine, but I think the merging process uses > >>>> > >>>> > >>the > >> > >> > >>>>lucene internal ID to match the documents. I wanna use the code > >>>> > >>>> > >>field > >> > >> > >>>>to > >>>>do that matching, is that possible?. I cannot be sure the lucene > >>>>internal ID's are the same for the same codes in both indexes. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Are you storing the internal Lucene Document Id in the 'code' > field? > >>> > >>> > >>>If you are, I suggest you change your application to use its own > set > >>> > >>> > >>of > >> > >> > >>>unique Ids to serve as 'primary keys' in your indices. > >>> > >>>Otis > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Thanks again, > >>>> > >>>>Albert > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>(re-directing to lucene-user list) > >>>>> > >>>>>Albert, > >>>>> > >>>>>If I understand your question correctly... You could run a query > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>like > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>the one you gave on both indices, but if one of them contains > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>documents > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>that have only one of those fields (cluster), then there will > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>never > >> > >> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>be > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>any matches in the second index. > >>>>> > >>>>>However, why not leave your big index along, add documents to a > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>new, > >> > >> > >>>>>smaller index, and then merge them periodically. I may be off > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>with > >> > >> > >>>>>this; it sounds like this is what you want to do, but I'm not > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>certain I > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>understood you fully. > >>>>> > >>>>>Otis > >>>>> > >>>>>--- Albert Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>>I was wondering If I can search using the MultiSearcher over > two > >>>>>>diferent indexes at the same time (with diferent fields). > >>>>>>I've got one big index, with the code, title, content, > language, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>etc > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>fields (new documents are added incrementally). Now, I have to > >>>>>>introduce > >>>>>>a clustering field. The problem is that I have to update the > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>whole > >> > >> > >>>>>>index > >>>>>>each time the clusters change, and I have no enought time to do > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>it > >> > >> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>(I > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>wanna check for new clusters every 10 minuts and I spent 25 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>minutes > >> > >> > >>>>>>to > >>>>>>reindex the whole index). > >>>>>>A query example could be: language:0 and title:java and > cluster:0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Can I leave the big index whitout any changes and create a new > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>index > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>with only the following fields, code and cluster, and perform > the > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>searches using this two indexes? I think I cannot do that > without > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>changing the code. It would need a postprocess, matching all > >>>>>>returning > >>>>>>codes from index 1 with index 2. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Anyone have a solution for this problem? I would appreciate > that. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>Albert Vila > >>>>Director de proyectos I+D > >>>>http://www.imente.com > >>>>902 933 242 > >>>>[iMente “La información con más beneficios”] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: > >>>> > >>>> > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>-- > >>Albert Vila > >>Director de proyectos I+D > >>http://www.imente.com > >>902 933 242 > >>[iMente “La información con más beneficios”] > >> > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Albert Vila > Director de proyectos I+D > http://www.imente.com > 902 933 242 > [iMente “La información con más beneficios”] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
