Bill, I have looked at the slides from PCH and a few web resources but I must admit there are a few issues that are not clear to me. In cases where the web hosting is done at a site say in the US whereby one has no access to the server's configuration, is anycast still an alternative? Are the routing issues so trivial that remote website hosts will be willing to delve into the configurations?
Regards CN > Which is why anycast routing is done in this sort of situation. Advertise the > same IP address in both locations, and let the routers figure out which is > closer. > -Bill
