On Friday 29 October 2004 12:18, Ezra Banoba wrote:

> Made a default installation of Suse and lent out my CD's
> immediately...then tried to compile some package and got the 'gcc not
> found'!!!

IIRC, following SuSE 8.0, multiple (and critical) packages aren't installed by 
default under a fresh install. Upgrading from older versions will maintain 
those important packages and upgrade them.

They haven't changed much over the versions (including 9.x), so you can 
probably make a mental note of adding them when you do the first 
installation, especially if you later plan to install packages from source 
(and not on SuSE CD's).

> Then tried to install some rpms and found each had a "VERY MANY" deps
> and sub-deps...That gave me my very first <bad> impression/experience
> with Suse and decided to keep it at minimum in my devel/production
> server environments and leave it to desktop installations.
>
> > ++ Installing and Using apt-get on a dedrat 8.0 box ,
>
> Have had some luck with apt-get though it first got bits of my system
> out of sync with the rest of the system. But it still beats the manual
> search and installation of dependencies.

I honestly wouldn't recommend apt, unless it's a box you really love to trash 
and rebuild all month long. While the joy of running cutting-edge comes 
naturally, it breaks quite a few things on legacy RPM-platforms. I'd keep apt 
very far from production gear. But, YMMV.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Reply via email to