If he had kept it updated like it should be, there is now way it could have been up for three years. But seriously NT was the first piece of serious OS out of Redmond and to-date I still think it is the most predictable. But that could be down to the growing number of grey hairs on my head, I'm probably still living in the past.
CN
| Ernest Byaruhanga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/19/2005 08:37 AM |
|
Kiggundu Mukasa said the following on 04/19/2005 07:04 AM:
>
> On 18 Apr 2005, at 19:33, Ronny wrote:
>
>>> 1.Why do you love Linux/Unix more than windows yet we all
>>> access a Microsoft windows box a day?
>
> 1. No viruses
> 2. No malware/spyware
> 3. No crashes (weeks of uptime!)
3 might be aguable with some MCSE i know - he says 2 of his WinNT
boxes have been up for 3 years so far! (i find it hard to believe
him though).
ernesto
_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
