On Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:17, Hari Kurup wrote: > But according to the original addressing scheme, > Bushnet should be using .21 > > BTW it seems the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is defunct?
Looks like it is: 2006-02-01 01:40:03 1F3uN7-0002Dh-5u == [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp defer (-53): retry time not reached for any host 2006-02-01 02:13:09 1F3t7i-00024L-Bu == [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp defer (110): Connection timed out 2006-02-01 02:13:09 1F3t7i-00024L-Bu ** [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retry timeout exceeded 2006-02-01 02:13:10 1F3tsH-00029u-Qd ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: retry time not reached for any host after a long failure period 2006-02-01 02:13:11 1F3uN7-0002Dh-5u ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp: retry time not reached for any host after a long failure period Mark.
pgp8SkcoO6lC6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
