On Wednesday 01 February 2006 12:04, Mark Tinka wrote: > On Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:17, Hari Kurup wrote: > > But according to the original addressing scheme, > > Bushnet should be using .21 > > > > BTW it seems the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list is defunct? > Looks like it is: > > 2006-02-01 01:40:03 1F3uN7-0002Dh-5u == [EMAIL PROTECTED] > R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp defer (-53): retry time not > reached for any host > 2006-02-01 02:13:09 1F3t7i-00024L-Bu == [EMAIL PROTECTED] > R=dnslookup T=remote_smtp defer (110): Connection timed > out
Hmm, I'll get in touch with the folks at cfi where this list is hosted. -- Noah. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Coffee does not make you nervous. your own inadequacies do that. Coffee merely increases your perception of your own inadequacies." --Rob Austein. _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
