Hi list, I have installed a USB isdn modem (Intracom netmod is the manufacturer) on suse 9.3
I used yast2 to install since it could not be seen on the command line. Command line was only quering the serial ports. Yast2 was able to detect the modem and install it. Right now am trying to dial with no success. Error is: Stdin not read/write and $MODEM not set I have set the init details as below with no success Init1 ATZ Init2 ATB40 Do you know the correct init details? Regards, Noel Rwamatsika > Send LUG mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of LUG digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Hari Kurup) > 2. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)) > 3. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Lutaaya Robert) > 4. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)) > 5. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Hari Kurup) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:26:17 +0300 > From: Hari Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? > To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > Ok, thanks for sharing the review. > Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) equivalent > for MS Visio. > Or even one that just opens .vsd files. > Any tips? > > -- > Hari Kurup > > > On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA) wrote: > >> out of curiosity, i decided to give staroffice 8.0 a try, and find out >> if it's worth the 80USD (compared to the free openoffice 2.0) >> >> after about a month, i can say that openoffice might be better than >> staroffice (apart from a few missing fonts - the proprietary ones i >> guess). >> >> where OO.org shines very well is importation of microsoft office >> documents. though not perfectly, it does much better at keeping them >> closer to their original than staroffice. >> >> so, why the 70 usd, when the free package is much better? >> >> e >> _______________________________________________ >> LUG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >> >> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >> for them in any way. >> --------------------------------------- >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:07:11 +0200 > From: "Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? > To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hari Kurup wrote the following on 08/31/2006 08:26 AM: >> Ok, thanks for sharing the review. >> Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) equivalent for >> MS Visio. >> Or even one that just opens .vsd files. >> Any tips? > > I also once tried to search and gave up. > > I run Microsoft Visio in FC5 over CrossOver Office pro 5.0 > > rgds > ernest > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:36:59 +0300 > From: Lutaaya Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? > To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I came across abc amber visio converter, its bound to solve your > problem. Visit www.downloadtopc.com/category/2/12/1/0.html > > Robert > > Hari Kurup wrote: > >> Ok, thanks for sharing the review. >> Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) equivalent >> for MS Visio. >> Or even one that just opens .vsd files. >> Any tips? >> >> -- >> Hari Kurup >> >> >> On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA) wrote: >> >>> out of curiosity, i decided to give staroffice 8.0 a try, and find out >>> if it's worth the 80USD (compared to the free openoffice 2.0) >>> >>> after about a month, i can say that openoffice might be better than >>> staroffice (apart from a few missing fonts - the proprietary ones i >>> guess). >>> >>> where OO.org shines very well is importation of microsoft office >>> documents. though not perfectly, it does much better at keeping them >>> closer to their original than staroffice. >>> >>> so, why the 70 usd, when the free package is much better? >>> >>> e >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LUG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>> >>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >>> for them in any way. >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LUG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >> >> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for >> them in any way. >> --------------------------------------- >> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:39:07 +0200 > From: "Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? > To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Lutaaya Robert wrote the following on 08/31/2006 10:36 AM: >> I came across abc amber visio converter, > > this runs on windoze. if he can run windoze, he can as well run visio. > > ebm > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:47:12 +0300 > From: Hari Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? > To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed > > Well, > > 1) It only runs on Win95,Win98,WinME,WinXP,WinNT > 4.x,Windows2000,Windows2003 > 2) You even have to buy it. > > But thanks anyway. > > -- > Hari Kurup > > > On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Lutaaya Robert wrote: > >> I came across abc amber visio converter, its bound to solve your >> problem. Visit www.downloadtopc.com/category/2/12/1/0.html >> >> Robert >> >> Hari Kurup wrote: >> >>> Ok, thanks for sharing the review. >>> Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) >>> equivalent for MS Visio. >>> Or even one that just opens .vsd files. >>> Any tips? >>> >>> -- >>> Hari Kurup >>> >>> >>> On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA) wrote: >>> >>>> out of curiosity, i decided to give staroffice 8.0 a try, and >>>> find out >>>> if it's worth the 80USD (compared to the free openoffice 2.0) >>>> >>>> after about a month, i can say that openoffice might be better than >>>> staroffice (apart from a few missing fonts - the proprietary ones i >>>> guess). >>>> >>>> where OO.org shines very well is importation of microsoft office >>>> documents. though not perfectly, it does much better at keeping them >>>> closer to their original than staroffice. >>>> >>>> so, why the 70 usd, when the free package is much better? >>>> >>>> e >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LUG mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>>> >>>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not >>>> responsible for them in any way. >>>> --------------------------------------- >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LUG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>> >>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >>> for them in any way. >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LUG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >> >> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >> for them in any way. >> --------------------------------------- >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > > End of LUG Digest, Vol 24, Issue 32 > *********************************** > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
