> Hi list, Hi Noel!
> > I have installed a USB isdn modem (Intracom netmod is the manufacturer) on > suse 9.3 > > I used yast2 to install since it could not be seen on the command line. > Command line was only quering the serial ports. > Yast2 was able to detect the modem and install it. > > Right now am trying to dial with no success. > Give us output of ls -al /dev/modem > Error is: > > Stdin not read/write and $MODEM not set > > I have set the init details as below with no success > > Init1 ATZ > > Init2 ATB40 > > Do you know the correct init details? IIRC, Intracom netmod uses these init strings Now, what are you using to dial? I suggest you try out wvdial, install it and put the details in /etc/wvdial.conf Then run the command wvdial on the console, preferably as root Let us know what happens > > Regards, > > > Noel Rwamatsika > Bernard > > >> Send LUG mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of LUG digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Hari Kurup) >> 2. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)) >> 3. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Lutaaya Robert) >> 4. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)) >> 5. Re: ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? (Hari Kurup) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:26:17 +0300 >> From: Hari Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? >> To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed >> >> Ok, thanks for sharing the review. >> Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) equivalent >> for MS Visio. >> Or even one that just opens .vsd files. >> Any tips? >> >> -- >> Hari Kurup >> >> >> On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA) wrote: >> >>> out of curiosity, i decided to give staroffice 8.0 a try, and find out >>> if it's worth the 80USD (compared to the free openoffice 2.0) >>> >>> after about a month, i can say that openoffice might be better than >>> staroffice (apart from a few missing fonts - the proprietary ones i >>> guess). >>> >>> where OO.org shines very well is importation of microsoft office >>> documents. though not perfectly, it does much better at keeping them >>> closer to their original than staroffice. >>> >>> so, why the 70 usd, when the free package is much better? >>> >>> e >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LUG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>> >>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >>> for them in any way. >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:07:11 +0200 >> From: "Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? >> To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Hari Kurup wrote the following on 08/31/2006 08:26 AM: >>> Ok, thanks for sharing the review. >>> Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) equivalent for >>> MS Visio. >>> Or even one that just opens .vsd files. >>> Any tips? >> >> I also once tried to search and gave up. >> >> I run Microsoft Visio in FC5 over CrossOver Office pro 5.0 >> >> rgds >> ernest >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:36:59 +0300 >> From: Lutaaya Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? >> To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> I came across abc amber visio converter, its bound to solve your >> problem. Visit www.downloadtopc.com/category/2/12/1/0.html >> >> Robert >> >> Hari Kurup wrote: >> >>> Ok, thanks for sharing the review. >>> Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) equivalent >>> for MS Visio. >>> Or even one that just opens .vsd files. >>> Any tips? >>> >>> -- >>> Hari Kurup >>> >>> >>> On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA) wrote: >>> >>>> out of curiosity, i decided to give staroffice 8.0 a try, and find out >>>> if it's worth the 80USD (compared to the free openoffice 2.0) >>>> >>>> after about a month, i can say that openoffice might be better than >>>> staroffice (apart from a few missing fonts - the proprietary ones i >>>> guess). >>>> >>>> where OO.org shines very well is importation of microsoft office >>>> documents. though not perfectly, it does much better at keeping them >>>> closer to their original than staroffice. >>>> >>>> so, why the 70 usd, when the free package is much better? >>>> >>>> e >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LUG mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>>> >>>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >>>> for them in any way. >>>> --------------------------------------- >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LUG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>> >>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for >>> them in any way. >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:39:07 +0200 >> From: "Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? >> To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Lutaaya Robert wrote the following on 08/31/2006 10:36 AM: >>> I came across abc amber visio converter, >> >> this runs on windoze. if he can run windoze, he can as well run visio. >> >> ebm >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:47:12 +0300 >> From: Hari Kurup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [LUG] ooo 2.0 vs staroffice 8 ? >> To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed >> >> Well, >> >> 1) It only runs on Win95,Win98,WinME,WinXP,WinNT >> 4.x,Windows2000,Windows2003 >> 2) You even have to buy it. >> >> But thanks anyway. >> >> -- >> Hari Kurup >> >> >> On Aug 31, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Lutaaya Robert wrote: >> >>> I came across abc amber visio converter, its bound to solve your >>> problem. Visit www.downloadtopc.com/category/2/12/1/0.html >>> >>> Robert >>> >>> Hari Kurup wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, thanks for sharing the review. >>>> Another thing, I have never found a good linux (or OSX) >>>> equivalent for MS Visio. >>>> Or even one that just opens .vsd files. >>>> Any tips? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Hari Kurup >>>> >>>> >>>> On Aug 29, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA) wrote: >>>> >>>>> out of curiosity, i decided to give staroffice 8.0 a try, and >>>>> find out >>>>> if it's worth the 80USD (compared to the free openoffice 2.0) >>>>> >>>>> after about a month, i can say that openoffice might be better than >>>>> staroffice (apart from a few missing fonts - the proprietary ones i >>>>> guess). >>>>> >>>>> where OO.org shines very well is importation of microsoft office >>>>> documents. though not perfectly, it does much better at keeping them >>>>> closer to their original than staroffice. >>>>> >>>>> so, why the 70 usd, when the free package is much better? >>>>> >>>>> e >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> LUG mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>>>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>>>> >>>>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>>>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not >>>>> responsible for them in any way. >>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> LUG mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>>> >>>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >>>> for them in any way. >>>> --------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LUG mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >>> %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ >>> >>> The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them >>> (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible >>> for them in any way. >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LUG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug >> >> >> End of LUG Digest, Vol 24, Issue 32 >> *********************************** >> > > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any > way. > --------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
