On Thursday 07 September 2006 13:14, andrew colin wrote: > Mandrake Made Better GUI tools that SUSE in any case, i dont > hear anyone complaining about them. The issue he raises here > is valid as per cloning of boxes suse creates interfaces and > devices using machine specific names such as the mac address > of the network card of course you understand that when you > clone that to an identical box it is not going to work. > > Well you may have never experienced nightmare with suse tools, > but believe me i have had Yast break so many times.
No utility is full/fool proof, even on commercial software. The reason I remain loyal to SuSE is because they have been predictable and consistent in their software design over the years - and yes, with regard to hardware, they are cutting edge, and that's not always bad. Mark.
pgppKenwmaKYY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
