On Friday 29 December 2006 10:00, Badru Ntege wrote:

> Bernard
>
> Thanks allot for that input.  It is very rare for an appreciative
> email these days on the list but atleast we ISP's can go out of
> the year and into the new year with these comments for that
> little contribution.  Most ISP's for the last three years have
> not bandwidth managed local IXP content and have no imediate
> plans of doing so.  The problem is there is not enough local
> content so unfortunately 80 90 % of all access goes to the
> internet.

I think, as is normally the case, bandwidth management should occur 
on the customer link (i.e., the link between the CPE and the 
service provider's terminating edge equipment). Most of the time, 
if this is a leased line, that takes care of itself (although 
keeping an eye on the telephone company's operation of said line 
can become administratively cumbersome as the network grows).

For cases where edge bandwidth management might be more difficult 
(fibre, wireless, e.t.c.), rate limting/QoS at the edge or border 
(routers, switches or hardware/software bandwidth managers) is an 
option, although an expensive one. This will differ with each ISP's 
bandwidth management and resource planning model.

In .zw, Ethernet over fibre is rife and cheap - everyone is doing it 
everywhere. There is absolutely no reason for most ISP's at the 
ZINX to manage bandwidth on their exchange point links - these 
links run at 100Mbps, or at least 10Mbps where distance is a 
problem.

However, in other countries where access to the exchange point is 
limited to leased lines or wireless infrastructure, where initial 
and/or recurring cost might be troublesome to maintain, in the long 
run, some ISP's would have to consider bandwidth management of 
local traffic.

Cheers,

Mark.

Attachment: pgpqApUY3xX9o.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
LUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug
%LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to