Hi Tinka, On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday 27 April 2010 02:43:09 am McTim wrote: > <snip> > > That's a (not so) pretty long path, mate. > > This underscores the need for EASSy.
Unless EASSy uses SEMEWE-4 as well. But more importantly, > that operators will buy capacity on at least 2 of the > systems (although both SEACOM and TEAMS routing via the east > doesn't help anyone). > > SEACOM should have been able to bring up their western route > by now. You mean around via SAT-3? I wonder why they didn't fallover to that cable days ago, guess they have no deal in place? -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
