Earning money by auxiliary services is still earning money from the content. Without the content the auxiliary services wouldn't exist. Would they?
On 09/08/2010, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Tim > > If you look back I actually pointed to the Google example. Where they do > not charge for the majority of their offering but have become the most > valuable brand. > > So I might not charge directly for Yradio but some anxilary service with a > very loose link to yradio might create a commercial opportunity. > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone from Zain Uganda > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Schofield <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 19:51:37 > To: Linux Users Group Uganda<[email protected]> > Reply-To: Linux Users Group Uganda <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [LUG] Experiment on Content (Yesterday's radio) > > > Well Badru did say earlier in this thread that he intends to earn > money by this site, so I am unsure on which side you are arguing Mike. > Should he pay some of the money he earns over to the artists or not? > > On 09/08/2010, Mike Barnard <[email protected]> wrote: > > wow... its getting hot in here.... Tim I think we miss what Badru started > by > > posting that link. He clearly and has clearly continued to say, " lets grow > > this. lets tackle all those grey areas as we grow this". > > > > I pasted a section of our newest IPR and Copyright laws, which you all seem > > to have ignored. There is no copyright that protects a broadcast. In our > > current law, taking from what Patrick Okui said, you may go ahead and > > rebrand a Sanyu FM broadcast and as per our law (i stand to be corrected) > > you are not infringing on any ones rights. > > > > Granted that all artists have a right to their material and to have it > > protected under the law, and this is catered for in the law. I had earlier > > said that if Badru was re-broadcasting these earlier broadcasts with the > > intention of making money, then the artists whose songs are aired in > Badru's > > re-broadcast have a right to sue Badru. If you are simply broadcasting with > > no intention of earning anything from it, look at the law, it does not > cater > > for that. > > > > Tim, you seem bent on this copyright issue and rightfully so, but apply it > > according to the laws of Uganda, not a law that we do not have in the land. > > The reason there was an amendment to the old 1960's IPR and Copyright law > > was to cater for the emerging markets. This is what Badru keeps on > > mentioning that we need to grow as YRadio continues to develop. I don't > > understand and see why you are opposing that. We need to grow, YRadio, in > > this heated debate has brought out areas that need to be ironed out as far > > as our laws are concerned. Stifling ideas because of looking at one > > countries laws over another will not help us grow. Allow us to experience > > this and make the necessary laws to protect our rights. You have learnt, > let > > us learn. Allow us the privilege of understanding what something is other > > than enforcing something someone else has understood from its inception. > > > > Badru, charge on. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Wire James <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > Get off your high horse. While many of us may be concerned about the > > rights of copyright holders, the situation not only in Uganda but many > other > > African Countries outside South Africa is similar. Many times members on > > this list who are in business can vouch for this, people have come up with > > proposals, ideas, innovations e.t.c and they are 'stolen' from them > > unashamedly and in most instances by corporates that originate from the so > > called purist countries you are trying to talk about. I recall a very > famous > > case of one Lugger whose company tussled it out with a giant over > > infringement of copyright on some software. This big company thought it > > would frustrate the guy through the court process but luckily enough, he > was > > able to push on till the big elephant sought an out of court settlement. > > However, how many people have been lucky enough to achieve such justice > here > > in Uganda? Few, very few. That is why you find the laissez faire attitude > > among the list members because we have more pressing problems and needs > than > > pretending that copyright will change our lives. Many times we submit > > proposals for jobs and they are 'copy n pasted' by competitors who have > > insiders in the organisations we are approaching. It is a dog eat dog world > > for now and I will unashamedly tell you that as for now, copyright issues > > are at the bottom of our list of problems to think about. I would rather > see > > Badru's project go on if its aim has a more positive impact on this nation > > eventually than guarding worthless songs that have nothing to copyright > > about. Many of these musicians would not even earn a dime if copyright was > > to be observed to the letter in this country. I remember 4 years ago a > > musician I helped to get paid US$ 1500 for a 3 hour show all because I came > > across his music on a website that he even didnt know about. Like someone > > said, it is a skewed market. Just understand it the way it is. > > > > > > Wire > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 14:26 +0300, Tim Schofield wrote: > > > On 09/08/2010, Joseph Abdi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Tim, > > > > > > > > It's because 90% of the list members have not faced copy-right issues > .. > > > > Also, since almost 90% of our website materials in Uganda don't use > > > > original materials one does not > > > > yet see the need or importance of copy-right ... > > > > > > > > And again, remember this is a LUG list (Open-Source) where FREE, COPY, > > > > RE-USE > > > > is Legal ...with the OS mentality and mind-set, you can hardly have > > support > > > > or understanding of it here .. > > > > > > No no no no. Open source is only about free re-use if you keep within > > > the narrow confines of the license that the software is issued under, > > > for example the GPL. It in no way condones the abuse of copyright. > > > Copyright is at the very heart of the GPL. Anyone on this list who is > > > using a kernel more recent than 2.6.13 is using some of my copyrighted > > > code which I allow them to do providing they stick to the letter of > > > the license that the code is released under (GPL v2.0). > > > > > > Every open source developer, and those who benefit from the use of > > > open source should be active in the protection of the rights of > > > copyright holders. I have spoken at LUG meetings around the world, and > > > never before found a group who consider that copyright holders rights > > > should be abused. > > > > > > You clearly believe the rest of the world will throw off its > > > fluffiness and join Uganda in this. Trust me you will be disappointed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LUG mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > > > > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > > > > > All Archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > > > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any > way. > > > --------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mike > > > > Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in > > a million chances happen 99% of the time. > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LUG mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > > > All Archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any > way. > > --------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > -- > WebERP Africa Ltd > +447710427049 > +256752963327 > +255784602561 > www.weberpafrica.com > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > LUG mailing list > [email protected] > http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug > > LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ > > All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including > attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. > --------------------------------------- > > > -- WebERP Africa Ltd +447710427049 +256752963327 +255784602561 www.weberpafrica.com _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
