In reply to Andrej Komelj (20.06.99 19:31): > Se strinjam, vendar pa moras pri dobrem sistemu dopustiti obe moznosti. > Pri WWW forumu ti ostane na razpolago samo 12 Mb newsreader. Pri usenetu > pa je opcij malo vec (med njimi tudi ne-prenasanje smeti). mislim - pa ne na pamet - da ni tezav narediti www kot alternativo, da torej oba nacina teceta vzporedno. www->mail se pac pri uvrstitvi sporocila v bazo hkrati generira mail, mail->www pa se pri sporocilih, ki spadajo v lugos*, pozene vnos v bazo.
- [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - pre... Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level -... Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level -... Anonymous
- Re[2]: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous
- Re: [ LUGOS ] entry vs 2nd-level - predlog Anonymous