Thanks, Brian. A more general comment: what is the use of invisible bugs, anyway? I suppose the bug has been set "private" by the reporter. Wouldn't it actually make sense to have all bugs open, such that others are warned of the issue? Guess if somebody doesn't want to disclose the company on behalf of which the bug was reported, a mechanism for anonymizing the reporter would make more sense. Anyway, I feel like hiding bugs is bad in an open source project.
Regards, Erich On Mittwoch 20 August 2008, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 16:47 +0200, Erich Focht wrote: > > > > Thanks but... I don't seem to be authorized to see that bug (?). > > Oh, yes. :-( I tend to forget to look at the privacy settings on bugs. > > > Is that bug fixed in 1.6.5.1? > > No. Reported on 1.6.5 in fact. > > > Any advice resulting from its content? > > None yet. It's been escalated to engineering though. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss