On 09/13/2010 08:56 AM, Nic Henke wrote: > P.S to get more accurate performance numbers, you probably want to run > 'lst stat writers 5& sleep 30'. You might want to take the middle 3 > data points and average them, discarding the first and last that could > be subject to LST overhead and ramp up/down. FWIW, this is what I do > when I'm benchmarking throughput rates.
This should read 'lst stat writers --delay 5 & sleep 30' There is also a '--count' parameter in more recent LNets that would allow you do to '--delay 5 --count 6' and avoid the sleep/kill. Nic _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
