Mark Nelson wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Several years ago there was a thread discussing some of the problems > with Lustre Quotas and what kinds of things might be done to move > forward. I was wondering if/how things have improved since then? Any > one have any thoughts/experiences they would be willing to share? > > Here's the thread from 2008: > http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel/2008-May/002451.html > > Thanks, > Mark > As everyone knows, HEAD(2.0) already supports quota. It has been done by Fanyong. Currently, a redesign and reimplementation for porting quota to kdmu is going on. Its main tasks include: 1. support new osd api 2. build separate quota connections between quota master and quota slaves, instead of using ldlm reverse import. Certainly, I will do some optimization for quota code at the same time. Other issues will be handled in the future.
landen _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss