thanks for this note. is lustre 2.0 regarded as stable for production? Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency 675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada. office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website http://molonc.bccrc.ca
On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Colin Faber wrote: > Hi, > > I've built several against 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 kernels without problem > so I would think you can probably get away with 0.1 as well. > > -cf > > > On 01/07/2011 06:05 PM, Samuel Aparicio wrote: >> Is it known if Lustre 2.0 GA will run with 2.6.18-194.17.1.0.1.el5 >> kernels. The test matrix has only the 164 kernel as the latest tested. >> >> Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath >> Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency >> 675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada. >> office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website >> http://molonc.bccrc.ca <http://molonc.bccrc.ca/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
