While 2.0 was submitted to quite heavy testing at Oracle before it's release, 
it has not been widely deployed for production at this point. All of the 
develoment and maintenance effort has gone into the next release (2.1) which is 
not released yet. I think that 2.1 will represent a much more sustainable 
target for production usage, when it is released. Until that happens, I would 
only recommend 2.0 for evaluation usage, and especially for sites new to Lustre 
that they stay on the tried-and-true 1.8 code base. 

Cheers, Andreas

On 2011-01-11, at 12:56, Samuel Aparicio <sapari...@bccrc.ca> wrote:

> thanks for this note.
> is lustre 2.0 regarded as stable for production?
> 
> Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath
> Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency
> 675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada.
> office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website 
> http://molonc.bccrc.ca
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 7, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Colin Faber wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I've built several against 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 kernels without problem 
>> so I would think you can probably get away with 0.1 as well.
>> 
>> -cf
>> 
>> 
>> On 01/07/2011 06:05 PM, Samuel Aparicio wrote:
>>> Is it known if Lustre 2.0 GA will run with 2.6.18-194.17.1.0.1.el5 
>>> kernels. The test matrix has only the 164 kernel as the latest tested.
>>> 
>>> Professor Samuel Aparicio BM BCh PhD FRCPath
>>> Nan and Lorraine Robertson Chair UBC/BC Cancer Agency
>>> 675 West 10th, Vancouver V5Z 1L3, Canada.
>>> office: +1 604 675 8200 cellphone: +1 604 762 5178: lab website 
>>> http://molonc.bccrc.ca <http://molonc.bccrc.ca/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to