Andreas:

   Thanks for taking a look at this. Unfortunately, I don't quite 
understand the guidance you present: "If you are seeing 'this' 
problem....". I haven't seen 'any' problems pertaining to >8tb yet, so I 
cannot place your guidance in the context of the question I posted.

My question was whether or not I need this parameter on the MDS and if 
so, how to apply it retroactively.  The Lustre environment I installed 
was the 1.8.5 set. Any insight in the issues would be appreciated.

Theo

On 7/14/2011 1:41 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> If you are seeing this problem it means you are using the ext3-based ldiskfs. 
> Go back to the download site and get the lustre-ldiskfs and lustre-modules 
> RPMs with ext4 in the name.
>
> That is the code that was tested with LUNs over 8TB. We kept these separate 
> for some time to reduce risk for users that did not need larger LUN sizes.  
> This is the default for the recent Whamcloud 1.8.6 release.
>
> Cheers, Andreas
>
> On 2011-07-14, at 11:15 AM, Theodore Omtzigt<t...@stillwater-sc.com>  wrote:
>
>> I configured a Lustre file system on a collection of storage servers
>> that have 12TB raw devices. I configured a combined MGS/MDS with the
>> default configuration. On the OSTs however I added the force_over_8tb to
>> the mountfsoptions.
>>
>> Two part question:
>> 1- do I need to set that parameter on the MGS/MDS server as well
>> 2- if yes, how do I properly add this parameter on this running Lustre
>> file system (100TB on 9 storage servers)
>>
>> I can't resolve the ambiguity in the documentation as I can't find a
>> good explanation of the configuration log mechanism that is being
>> referenced in the man pages. The fact that the doc for --writeconf
>> states "This is very dangerous", I am hesitant to pull the trigger as
>> there is 60TB of data on this file system that I rather not lose.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

Reply via email to