Thank you for the clarification. On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, 01:36 Laura Hild <l...@jlab.org> wrote:
> Hi Shambhu- > > I believe neither the ldiskfs nor ZFS OSDs support an active-active > configuration (except in the sense that one can have multiple targets, some > of which are active on one host and others on another). It seems > reasonable to me, only having used DRBD and Lustre independently of each > other, that it would be possible to use DRBD in active-passive mode in > place of shared storage for fail-over, but with inferior performance. > Clients would connect to whichever server is currently active for a > particular target. > > If instead what you're talking about is mounting a filesystem for > simultaneous use on the DRBD hosts themselves, you're looking for a > "shared-disk" clustered filesystem, not Lustre, which is a "distributed" > clustered filesystem. > > -Laura > >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
