Hi Shambhu,
I also think active-active is not possible here - two NIDs for the same target? - but we have been running our MDTs on top of DRBD, which works quite
well. The last time I compared this setup against a mirror of storage targets, DRBD was actually a bit faster.
And it might improve if you use protocol B or A instead of C.
Regards,
Thomas
On 3/15/23 12:29, Shambhu Raje via lustre-discuss wrote:
I am trying to configure a clustered file system over DRBD software so that
if we mount a file system just like LustreFS over DRBD set -up in dual
primary mode it can provide us with the real time replication of data . Can
I configure lustre file system over DRBD in redhat 8.7 .......
If yes, how can it be configured ?
Waiting for your supporting response.
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
