No argument here.  The extended bass length is precisely for that 
purpose.......with the longer basses, the required strings will necessarily 
require a smaller string diameter.  I am uncertain if it gives more volume 
and sustain, but for sure, a better clarity of pitch and sound.  These 
instruments were designed for gut strings.

ed



At 01:06 PM 1/29/2005 -0700, Michael Thames wrote:
>It seems the vary concept of creating a swan neck, or Jauch type extension
>was to make up for some type of deficiency in the bass register, namely
>sustain and volume.
>Michael Thames
>www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Edward Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "LGS-Europe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lute net" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 12:24 PM
>Subject: Re: Gutsy stories
>
>
> > David,
> >
> > I read this article, your "work in progress", and I can thank you for
> > publishing it.  Your experiences are very similar to mine.....  I have 1
> > lute in synthetic strings, where the others are all in gut, and I love the
> > gut sound as well.  It is too hard to resort back to the synthetics. after
> > experiencing all the good qualities of gut.
> >
> > For me, all gut has been a 10-year experience, and I have also gone
>through
> > many possible combinations of strings, and I agree, in that I favor
> > the  Pistoy over the Gimped string.  Not that the Gimped is more metallic
> > in sound, but the sustain in tone is clearer and warmer in the Pistoy, or
> > all-gut string.  I think that when one weaves a wire into the string, it
> > loses some of its flexibility, and this increase in stiffness will make
>for
> > a faster decay in sound.  I also find that a strong octave string is
> > essential, when dealing with the lower register on a baroque lute.
> >
> > In terms of tuning, I find that if I arrive 3 hours in advance in the
> > concert hall, & if I merely take the instrument out of the case & allow it
> > to equilibrate to that particular room, it settles in and the experience
>of
> > tuning is much less of a problem, than if one had merely gotten there &
> > started to tune & play.  In fact I find it better to tune gut as compared
> > to synthetics.  The exception to that is in hot, humid conditions in the
> > summer.
> >
> > It took "a lot of guts" for you to write this article!
> >
> > ed
> >
> >
> >
> > At 04:57 PM 1/29/2005 +0100, LGS-Europe wrote:
> > >I've put my experiences of the past year and a half of playing on gut
> > >strings in an article on my website. It's called 'Gut strings, a work in
> > >progress' and is on my homepage: Http://home.planet.nl/~d.v.ooijen/david.
> > >
> > >David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >*****************************************
> > >David van Ooijen
> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Http://home.planet.nl/~d.v.ooijen/
> > >*****************************************
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >To get on or off this list see list information at
> > >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
> >
> >
> > Edward Martin
> > 2817 East 2nd Street
> > Duluth, Minnesota  55812
> > e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > voice:  (218) 728-1202
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >



Edward Martin
2817 East 2nd Street
Duluth, Minnesota  55812
e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice:  (218) 728-1202




Reply via email to