In case someone doesn't know it, there's an enjoyable paper by Ross Duffin 
online:

"Why I hate Valotti (or is it Young?)":
http://music.cwru.edu/duffin/

Regards,

Stephan


Am 19 Nov 2007 um 18:03 hat Stewart McCoy geschrieben:

> Dear David,
> 
> The temperament known as Valotti was presumably invented by the eponymous 
> Valotti.
> 
> If keyboards are tuned to Valotti, one should tune one's theorbo to 6th 
> comma meantone, which will mean that all the white notes sound well 
> together, but the black notes won't sound so good on the keyboards. As long 
> as you avoid dodgy enharmonics on the theorbo, the plucked strings will 
> sound sweeter than the same notes played on the keyboards.
> 
> Asking players to switch from A=415 to A=411 and back in the same concert is 
> plain daft.
> 
> If you have to play chords of G# major and C# minor at A=448, is there any 
> mileage in tuning your theorbo a semitone lower? It would mean those chords 
> would then be played as A major and D minor. If that creates more problems 
> than it solves, forget it.
> 
> One of the problems of tuning one's theorbo to a higher pitch than normal, 
> is that there is an increased strain on the neck of the instrument. My 
> theorbo is tuned at A=415, and is not designed to go up to A=440. However, 
> if I need to play at A=440, I get round the problem by turning the 14th 
> course (G) down to nothing, and the 12th course (B) down to G. That takes 
> the strain off the neck, and enables the other strings to go up to A=440. 
> The disadvantages are that I lose a low B, which is no great loss most of 
> the time, and the low G is rather weedy played on the 12th course.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> Stewart McCoy.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "LGS-Europe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:41 AM
> Subject: [LUTE] tuning blues
> 
> 
> > Bad tuning karma weekend. Saturday Alexander's Feast by Handel. Baroque 
> > orchestra at 415 Valotti. Who invented Valotti? Not a lute player I 
> > presume. In the break we had to move to another part of the church, 
> > unheated, to play a Handel organ concerto. At 411. After the break back to 
> > 415. Actually we managed to remain stable, but there was lots of 
> > complaining in the orchestra. Understandably.
> >
> > Sunday, other church, other orchestra. Buxtehude, Hollanders and 
> > Charpentier at 448. Baroque string players were struggling, strings didn't 
> > break, but were not stable. Organ in ET. Cello was way of in his sharps. 
> > He just couldn't match it. Perhaps because of the high pitch, perhaps of 
> > the ET. But some of the music was in C# minor (how does one play G#-major 
> > chords on a theorbo in A?), so there wasn't really another option than ET 
> > anyway.
> >
> > Next week Maria Vespers at 440. 1/4 comma MT, presumably. Should be fine 
> > again.
> >
> > David
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to