You know, it certainly looks like a reasonable teaching tool. Some color can be
added:
I= { \override Stem #'color = #red \override Beam #'color = #red \stemUp
g'4\1 g'8\1 g'\1 \bar "|" d'4\2 d'\2 \bar "|" r8 a'\1 g'\1 f'\2 ees'\2 g'16.\1
a'32\1
\bar "|"}
II= {\stemDown s1 d'8\2 d'\2 bes\3 bes\3 r16 c'\3 ees'8\2 }
III= { \override Stem #'color = #(x11-color 'LimeGreen) \override Beam
#'color = #(x11-color 'LimeGreen) \stemUp g8\4 g16\4 a\3 bes\3 g\4 bes8\3 g4\4
g\4 fis8\4 s s s g4 }
IV= {\stemDown g,4\6 g,8\6 g,\6 g,\6 g,16\6 a,\6 bes,\6 g,\6 bes,\6
c\5 d8\5 d\5 ees\5 d16\5 bes,\6
c8\5 c\5 }
With colors, we could almost get up there with elementary school string
teachers... SlateBLue2 - what a potential!
alexander
Peter Nightingale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> Here is your FdM lilypond tab spread out over two staves:
> http://phys.uri.edu/~nigh/tab-in-lily2.pdf
>
> I find it quite intriguing!
>
> And here is your slightly expanded lilypond code, which compiles without
> collision warnings:
>
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
