There is that possibility, but with the right touch and a good ear one actually
has more pitch flexibility with thicker frets.

DD

Also, isn't there a greater possibility that fingering at a thicker fret will distort the pitch for that given note according to the pressure
applied?

Ron (UK)

-----Original Message-----
From: Martyn Hodgson [mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:24 AM
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; damian dlugolecki
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...



Not really true that thicker frets have 'no drawback' - the use of thinner frets (but still graduated by the same amount from lowest to highest) allows the lute to be set more 'fine' than with thicker frets ie the distance required to depress the string to the fingerboard is less. Conversely, if one so desired, the use of even thicker frets (but still with the same amount of overall graduation) would result in a very significant increase in the distance required to depress a string
  and concomitant difficulties of execution.

  MH
--- On Wed, 18/3/09, damian dlugolecki <dam...@teleport.com> wrote:

    From: damian dlugolecki <dam...@teleport.com>
    Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...
    To: "Martyn Hodgson" <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>,
    lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
    Date: Wednesday, 18 March, 2009, 3:47 AM

The projection of the string is determined by the height of the nut
  and
the holes in the bridge. If the neck has a set or slight warp,
  thicker
frets will be called for and that thickness will be determined by
  the
     projection of the strings.
I used to use much thinner frets but as Dan Winheld has noted, there
  is
     no drawback whatever to using thicker frets.
     Cordially,
     Damian
Why don't you try a much thinner 9th fret (say 0.50mm) which not
  only
fits with Dowland's fretting advice (the principal historic source
  of
fret sizes) but would also enable you to have smaller lower frets,
  say
     down to 0.90mm and thereby set the lute 'fine'?
     MH
--- On Tue, 17/3/09, damian dlugolecki <[1][1]dam...@teleport.com>
  wrote:
       From: damian dlugolecki <[2][2]dam...@teleport.com>
       Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...
       To: "Daniel Winheld" <[3]dwinh...@comcast.net>,
  [4]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
       Date: Tuesday, 17 March, 2009, 3:52 AM
"Using the thinnest frets that you can get away with" is a basic premise for fretting, but there are many lutes where the neck has
  set
     (but hopefully not twisted)
where heavy frets are called for. My baroque lute represents just
  such
an instance where everything is fine except that much thicker frets
  are
     called for and more
care in selecting sizes to taper up to the 10th fret. Here is the
  fret
     scheme for my lute:
     frets
     1,2,3   1.25 mm
     4,5       1.20 "
     6          1.10 "
     7          1.05 "
     8          1.00 "
     9           .95  "
     10         .85  "
So if you find you need heavier frets, do not be alarmed. My lute plays beautifully, there is no undue wear on the strings on the
  finger
     board,
and everything is in tune. You may have to invest in some fret gut,
     but like tuning, it's part of the job.
     Damian
     Please visit my web site at www.damianstrings.com
     ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Winheld"
     <[3][5]dwinh...@comcast.net>
     To: <[4][6]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
     Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 11:57 AM
     Subject: [LUTE] Re: Hi guys, nylon frets...
> Dana- this seems like excellent advice & cautions in regard to
  nylon
> frets. In line with that, I would also advise noting what the neck > and fingerboard are made of- ebony fingerboard with ebony veneered > neck would seem to be best; in any case the hardest, toughest
  woods
     > possible would be in order.
> Anything else, especially if the lute is of some value, could be > counter productive so why not go with the easier, safer, and in
  any
     > case better sounding traditional alternative?
     >
> That said, I would also advise the thinnest frets that you could
  get
> away with. Dowland's advice seems appropriate here; he starts with > 4th course for the first two frets (.85 - .90 mm), next two of 3rd > course size, (.70-ish) 5th & 6th fret, 2nd course; and the rest
     > trebles.
     >
> Also single frets would be best; while the traditional doubles are > rarely used by modern lutenists anyway, only gut doubles will "bed > down" properly for cleanest sound. Attempting to get enough
  tension
> for tightness, and for the fret to lie flat near the fingerboard > edges at the first fret position with 1.15 nylon would take two > gorillas with vice grip pliers. And a titanium neck with carbon
     > fingerboard.
     >
     > Dan
     >
     >
>> Nylon can be made to work, but it even more of a pain in the
     proverbial
>> than gut. It is stronger than most neck woods and will leave an >> indentation; some like that, it marks where the fret goes. Others
     dislike
>> it for the same reason, get it wrong and you are stuck. The
  knots
     are
>> prickly, and burning them makes noxious smoke which you really
     shouldnt
     >> inhale.
     >>
>> Nylon is probably longer lasting than gut, but not forever, I
  have
     had
     >> nylon frets break.
     >>
     >> I switched to gut a long time ago and far prefer it.
     >>
>> The first fret is particularly challenging as you have so little
     room
>> above it to use in stretching the knot tighter; I always found
     pliers
>> necesary on the first fret; leave the ends long enough that you
  can
     grip
>> away from the knot, then wrap a length around the jaws, you dont
     want to
>> be squashing the nylon to get a grip anywhere near the knot.
     >> --
     >> Dana Emery
     >
     > --
     >
     >
     > To get on or off this list see list information at
> [5][7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     >
     --
  References
     1. mailto:[8]dam...@teleport.com
     2. mailto:[9]dam...@teleport.com
     3.

[10]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dwinh...@comcast.net
     4.

[11]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
5. [12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

  --

References

1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dam...@teleport.com 2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dam...@teleport.com 3. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dwinh...@comcast.net 4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=l...@cs.dartmouth.edu 5. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dwinh...@comcast.net 6. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
8. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dam...@teleport.com 9. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dam...@teleport.com 10. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=dwinh...@comcast.net 11. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
 12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html







Reply via email to