>>For a laugh (or to be appalled, as is your nature) take a look at: >> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_in_Elizabethan_Era
well, yes, it needs a bit of redaction. Wiki articles are written by committees of anonymous contributers working independently. Eventually things get sorted out. Join the club and fix what can be fixed, the citations look to me to be what one would find at a small local library. Computer topics tend to be a lot better. >>Does anyone know the procedure for getting an article >>removed? if you register as an editor you may find some contacts for that sort of thing. I would edit it to add challenges for citation on every wrong fact, but I would also attempt a rewrite. 3 stringed lute and cittern son of lute gotta go. The picture of a 'bass shalm' needs recaptioning, tenor shalm I would believe, bass would be as tall as the player. -- Dana Emery To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html