Of course it is (common knowledge, that is, at least relatively so).
But with modern classical guitars sometimes strung to 9 kg or so, the
single string functions at as high or higher a tension than the paired
course. Also, fingerpicking steel-string guitars is not uncommon, and
even lightly strung, they tend to be even higher tension.
Regarding the act of plucking itself, the feeling of stiffness imparted
by short scale length doesn't hinder after a little practice. If
anything, it increases speed and accuracy because the strings are more
consistently close to where they started. It's a similar effect to
plucking very, very near the bridge, as is now common on baroque
instruments. Because of scale length alone, with my pinky near to the
bridge of a mandolino, my m, i, and p are much nearer to the relative
center of the vibrating string length than they would be on a baroque
lute. I don't play d-minor lute, but I don't mind noodling on other
folks' on occasion. Plucking near the bridge of a d-minor lute feels
only slightly different to me. I suppose that may be only because I'm
so accustomed to plucking mandolino now.
Plucking a mandolino using the finest functional strings that are
readily available isn't that much different with minimal practice. Not
many yet, but as mentioned earlier, there are a fair number of
recordings that demonstrate so nicely: Tyler, O'Dette, Wedemeier, etc.
I'm excited to hear another such recording is pending with the
scholarly Davide Rebuffa doing the plucking.
I think it's possible that the high tessitura of such things may in
part be why chamber music and concerti make up such a higher relative
proportion of extant baroque mandolino repertoire, where that for lute
favors solos. Not only does the expanded bass lend itself to a more
satisfying self accompaniment on lute, but all the previously discussed
factors trend to add up to better projection, a better ability to "cut"
above accompanying instruments. Also, I am aware of absolutely no
evidence one way or the other, but I suspect nail use may have been
more common to mandolino players than d-minor lute players.
...And by the early classical and the era of published mandolin
methods, the burgeoning popularity of the Neapolitan type, the music of
Hoffmann, etc. it DOES appear that plectrum play on 4th-tuned
mandolini was becoming common.
Really, before losing oneself in bewilderment, one should pick up a 5-
or 6-course mandolino and pluck a few notes with the fingers. It's not
so bad.
Best,
Eugene
----- Original Message -----
From: Martyn Hodgson <hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Sunday, May 30, 2010 4:09 am
Subject: [LUTE] Re: baroque mandolins etc--- tensions and kgs?
To: Lute List <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>, EUGENE BRAIG IV
<brai...@osu.edu>
>
> Dear Eugene,
>
> There is really is no difficulty here. The heart of
> the matter is that
> tension needs to be related to string length, so
> that with similar
> instruments, bigger ones (and used eg Dowland as
> said)) higher tension
> than their smaller counterparts - see the earlier
> communication about
> this. So for a small string length, like on the
> mandolino which is
> around half the string length of a mean lute, a
> tension of as low as a
> half is suggested for similar 'feel' ie 3Kg/2 =
> 1.5Kg (which is why I
> suggested a trial at around this level). The
> converse is also the case
> with large theorbos needing higher tensions than a
> mean lute.
>
> The modern 'classical' guitar is single strung
> (like some theorbos) and
> can be played with a higher level of tension (as
> Stuart found out when
> he tried single strings).
>
> I thought all this was common knowledge.....
>
> regards
>
> Martyn
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 30/5/10, EUGENE BRAIG IV
> <brai...@osu.edu> wrote:
>
> From: EUGENE BRAIG IV <brai...@osu.edu>
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: baroque mandolins
> etc--- tensions and kgs?
> To: "Lute List" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> Date: Sunday, 30 May, 2010, 5:26
>
> I don't know why tension should
> have much to do with punteado vs.
> plectrum. I also certainly
> would not consider approx. 3.0-4.0 kg
> per
> string (as I use on my mandolino)
> "high" tension. Guitars are often
> much higher, modern classical or
> even 19th c. It's not even far
> from
> what some players use on
> lutes. On his string calculator page,
> Arto cites 3.0 kg as his standard
> and 4.0 as preferred on archlute.
> Eugene
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Stuart Walsh
> <[1]s.wa...@ntlworld.com> Date:
> Friday, May 28, 2010 6:13 pm
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: baroque
> mandolins etc--- tensions and kgs?
> To: David van Ooijen
> <[2]davidvanooi...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Lute List <[3]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
> > David van Ooijen wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:17
> PM, Stuart Walsh
> > <[4]s.wa...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Is there a simple
> explanation, somewhere, of string tensions
> > and what 3kg or
> > >> 7 kg etc means and what is
> the significance of it. I've never
> > understood>> what it's all about.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I wrote this some years ago,
> so I could understand what it was
> > all about:
> > >
> > > - Calculating String Tensions
> > > Explaining the why and how of
> calculating strings for lutes.
> > >
> > >
>
>
[5]http://home.planet.nl/~ooije006/david/writings/stringtension_f.htm
> >
> > Thank you for this. I
> read it as carefully as I could!
> >
> > To be honest, I got as far as
> "the frequency of a string
> > [frequency=pitch?] is directly
> related [=is?] the square root of
> > its
> > tension." and a sort of filter
> kicks in.
> > A bit like when a plumber comes
> to fix something (at great
> > expense) and
> > explains all the minute details
> when I just want to know whether
> > the
> > toilet will flush or not.
> >
> > But what you say confirms
> (if I've understood you) what I
> > thought about
> > high tension stringing, playing
> with nails (plectrum) etc and
> > that maybe
> > old instruments were more
> lightly constructed with strings
> > at lower
> > tension, needing a gentler mode
> of playing.
> >
> > And so this is the
> problem with tiny instruments like the
> > mandolino
> > where the strings are
> inevitably (?) going to be high tension -
> > how can
> > they be fingerstyle/punteado
> instruments rather than plectrum
> > instruments (even if some of
> the music for them looks -
> > superficially? -
> > as if it can't be played with
> a plectrum)
> >
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> > (not a plectrum player)
> --
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> [6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
> --
>
> References
>
> 1.
> http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
2.
http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=davidvanooi...@gmail.com
> 3.
> http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=s.wa...@ntlworld.com
> 5.
> http://home.planet.nl/~ooije006/david/writings/stringtension_f.htm
6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> --
