Very interesting example Stuart: where's it from? Is it one of the
   transcriptions from a lute source?

   My comment about the bandora repertoirs being manageable with a string
   length in the 70s wouldn't seem to include this example - which is
   indeed tricky!  As you say it might be a singular anomaly: perhaps a
   literal intabluation error - indeed, it's odd that it wasn't all
   intabulated in the 5th 'position' [ie 1f, 3f, 4h chord shape as found
   in Holborne pieces] - maybe the voice leading?.

   I've just skimmed the Holborne and Barley pieces and Dd.2.11 but
   couldn't spot it there, but maybe the skimming was too light.....

   M



   --- On Tue, 14/6/11, Stuart Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: Stuart Walsh <[email protected]>
     Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: bandora tunes
     To: "Nancy Carlin" <[email protected]>
     Cc: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>, "Lute Net"
     <[email protected]>, "Lute builder Dmth"
     <[email protected]>, "Cittern Dmth"
     <[email protected]>
     Date: Tuesday, 14 June, 2011, 22:27

      On 14/06/2011 20:08, Nancy Carlin wrote:
        I think it is now common knowledge among the few people who build
        orpharions and bandoras that the bridges should be tapered higher
        off the belly on the bass side. Here is a link to some details on
        the Palmer orphario (the 9 course instrument in Denmark).
        [1][1]http://www.darryl-martin.co.uk/palmer.htm
        Unfortunately the bridge is a replacement.  If you read the
   pamphlet
        on wire strings that the Lute Society (England) puts out you will
        see that the Rose orpharion also has a replacement bridge.
        About the tension on my 2 orpharions - my 6 course Rose (built by
        Peter Biffin in 1984) feels like it has a bit more tension, and I
   am
        very happy with the intonation.  My 9 course Palmer (built by
   Bruce
        Brook in 2009) has lots more strings and the tension feels
   lighter.
        During the year + I have had it, the intonation problems have
        improved with a combination of string changes and my improved
   skill
        in getting my left hand fingers where they needed to be for this
        instrument, plus I got a better tuner.  On the Palmer, I had
        initially tried an octave on the 6th course, but if the 2
   different
        strings were pulled slightly off, the intonation was much more
        offensive than with unison strings.  Both instruments have a
   tastini
        to help intonation, but they are in different places.
        About the string clashing and other assorted buzzes and nasty
   noises
        - If you hit a string too hard it can buzz on the metal frets -
        something that lute players don't need to worry about.  With my 2
        instruments the feel of the frets is quite different. The Rose has
        lower scallops between each fret, so it's harder to get a good
   clear
        sound for bar chords. The Palmer has a lovely low action and the
   bar
        chords are a dream, unless you are pulling a string a bit to the
        side.  The Rose has the string in the pairs closer together, which
        works well with that bit more tension. The Palmer has the string
        further apart and it has taken a  while to get used to the spacing
        One more thing about the tension and playability - my borrowed
        bandora, which is old and seems quite high tension, has no
   scallops
        between the frets, but works well for intonation and bar chords.
        It's biggest problem is that it is quite loud, especially when
        combined with lutes.
        Nancy
      Another interesting bandora issue is that there were (or may have
   been)
      smaller bandoras. Peter Forrester and Donald Gill (and others?) have
      suggested that bandoras in D,  a fourth higher, existed. There are
   some
      very difficult stretches in some of the bandora solos (but not in
   the
      existing bandora consort parts, I think). For example, this chord:
      third course, second fret + second course, first fret + first
   course,
      fifth fret. On an instrument with the first course at about 72cms
      that's an enormous stretch.  (Of course, this might just be an
   anomaly)
      Stuart
      --
   References
      1. [2]http://www.darryl-martin.co.uk/palmer.htm
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. http://www.darryl-martin.co.uk/palmer.htm
   2. http://www.darryl-martin.co.uk/palmer.htm
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to