It's not so much that he's 'wrong' but that the evidence can be
   interpreted in other ways......

   rgds

   M
   --- On Sat, 18/6/11, Nancy Carlin <[email protected]>
   wrote:

     From: Nancy Carlin <[email protected]>
     Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: bandora tunes
     To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>, "Stuart Walsh"
     <[email protected]>
     Cc: "Lute Net" <[email protected]>, "Lute builder Dmth"
     <[email protected]>, "Cittern Dmth"
     <[email protected]>
     Date: Saturday, 18 June, 2011, 0:07

   Your comments about Ian Harwood's idea on pitch have been running
   around in my head. has anyone written any article in rebuttal?  I would
   be interested in what the arguments are about why he is wrong.
   Nancy


     Thank you for this Nancy. Unfortunately I can't find the paper to
     which you refer on your site - it's probably staring me in the face,
     so please point me in the right direction.

     As an aside, without seeing your paper, I'm not at all convinced of
     the existence of small Bandoras (ie with string length similar to
     that of the extant Palmer orpharion) at the time.  Ian Harwood's
     speculations and conclusions on pitch and the sizes of English viols
     is also open to question.

     LH stretches are, of course, much a matter of what one gets used to:
     regularly playing theorbos and the large continuo gallichon (with a
     string length of 93cm and, interestingly, tuned identically to the
     bandora), a string length in the mid/high 70s seems very manageable
     for the extant bandora repertoire.

     rgds

     Martyn

     --- On Tue, 14/6/11, Nancy Carlin <[email protected]>
     wrote:

          From: Nancy Carlin <[email protected]>
          Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: bandora tunes
          To: "Stuart Walsh" <[email protected]>
          Cc: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>, "Lute Net"
          <[email protected]>, "Lute builder Dmth"
          <[email protected]>, "Cittern Dmth"
          <[email protected]>
          Date: Tuesday, 14 June, 2011, 22:50
          Yes, I discussed then "high pitch" bandora issue in my article
          on bandora music - now available on my web site
          [1]www.GroundsandDivisions.info
          I am a big advocate of the orpharion sized instrument for a lot
          of the solo bandora music. While some of the slower,
          processional type pieces sounds great at the bass range, there
          are some pieces with lots of fast notes that sound like mud on a
          bass instrument. What really sealed the deal for me was when I
          visited Chris Morrogiello, who has a very nice high-pitch
          bandora made by Peter Forrester. We sight read through some
          consort lesson with just me on that bandora and Chris playing a
          treble lute. The balance was perfect and some of those pieces
          did not sound bad with 4 parts missing.
          In addition to the long stretches in the bandora solos, there
          are also places where you need to fret a note on the 7th course,
          wile playing notes on the first string. Unless you have very big
          hands that's hard on the bass instrument.  The best explanation
          of the pitches in England at this time, that I have read is Ian
          Harwood's article in Early Music. He documents a number of the
          sizes of gambas and which ones could have been played together.
          Nancy

          On 14/06/2011 20:08, Nancy Carlin wrote:

          I think it is now common knowledge among the few people who
          build orpharions and bandoras that the bridges should be tapered
          higher off the belly on the bass side. Here is a link to some
          details on the Palmer orphario (the 9 course instrument in
          Denmark).
          [2]http://www.darryl-martin.co.uk/palmer.htm
          Unfortunately the bridge is a replacement.  If you read the
          pamphlet on wire strings that the Lute Society (England) puts
          out you will see that the Rose orpharion also has a replacement
          bridge.
          About the tension on my 2 orpharions - my 6 course Rose (built
          by Peter Biffin in 1984) feels like it has a bit more tension,
          and I am very happy with the intonation.  My 9 course Palmer
          (built by Bruce Brook in 2009) has lots more strings and the
          tension feels lighter.  During the year + I have had it, the
          intonation problems have improved with a combination of string
          changes and my improved skill in getting my left hand fingers
          where they needed to be for this instrument, plus I got a better
          tuner.  On the Palmer, I had initially tried an octave on the
          6th course, but if the 2 different strings were pulled slightly
          off, the intonation was much more offensive than with unison
          strings.  Both instruments have a tastini to help intonation,
          but they are in different places.
          About the string clashing and other assorted buzzes and nasty
          noises - If you hit a string too hard it can buzz on the metal
          frets - something that lute players don't need to worry about.
          With my 2 instruments the feel of the frets is quite different.
          The Rose has lower scallops between each fret, so it's harder to
          get a good clear sound for bar chords. The Palmer has a lovely
          low action and the bar chords are a dream, unless you are
          pulling a string a bit to the side.  The Rose has the string in
          the pairs closer together, which works well with that bit more
          tension. The Palmer has the string further apart and it has
          taken a  while to get used to the spacing
          One more thing about the tension and playability - my borrowed
          bandora, which is old and seems quite high tension, has no
          scallops between the frets, but works well for intonation and
          bar chords. It's biggest problem is that it is quite loud,
          especially when combined with lutes.
          Nancy
          Another interesting bandora issue is that there were (or may
          have been) smaller bandoras. Peter Forrester and Donald Gill
          (and others?) have suggested that bandoras in D,  a fourth
          higher, existed. There are some very difficult stretches in some
          of the bandora solos (but not in the existing bandora consort
          parts, I think). For example, this chord: third course, second
          fret + second course, first fret + first course, fifth fret. On
          an instrument with the first course at about 72cms that's an
          enormous stretch.  (Of course, this might just be an anomaly)
          Stuart
          Nancy Carlin Associates
          P.O. Box 6499
          Concord, CA 94524  USA
          phone 925/686-5800 fax 925/680-2582
          web sites - [3]www.nancycarlinassociates.com
          www.groundsanddivisions.info
          Representing:
          FROM WALES - Crasdant  & Carreg Lafar,  FROM ENGLAND - Jez Lowe
          & Jez Lowe & The Bad Pennies, and now representing EARLY MUSIC -
          The Venere Lute Quartet, The Good Pennyworths & Morrongiello &
          Young
          Administrator THE LUTE SOCIETY OF AMERICA
          web site - [4]http://LuteSocietyofAmerica.org

   Nancy Carlin Associates
   P.O. Box 6499
   Concord, CA 94524  USA
   phone 925/686-5800 fax 925/680-2582
   web sites - [5]www.nancycarlinassociates.com
   [6]www.groundsanddivisions.info
   Representing:
   FROM WALES - Crasdant  & Carreg Lafar,  FROM ENGLAND - Jez Lowe & Jez
   Lowe & The Bad Pennies, and now representing EARLY MUSIC - The Venere
   Lute Quartet, The Good Pennyworths & Morrongiello & Young
   Administrator THE LUTE SOCIETY OF AMERICA
   web site - [7]http://LuteSocietyofAmerica.org

   --

References

   Visible links
   1. http://www.groundsanddivisions.info/
   2. http://www.darryl-martin.co.uk/palmer.htm
   3. http://www.groundsanddivisions.info/
   4. http://lutesocietyofamerica.org/
   5. http://www.nancycarlinassociates.com/
   6. http://www.groundsanddivisions.info/
   7. http://lutesocietyofamerica.org/

   Hidden links:
   8. http://www.groundsanddivisions.info/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to