As for me I meant bottom of the string and top of the fret

   2012/2/5 William Samson <[1]willsam...@yahoo.co.uk>

       Just going to be picky for a sec - Are we talking about the
     distance
       between the bottom of the string and the surface of the
     fingerboard, or
       the top of the fret?  Could make a significant difference.
       Bill
       From: brentlynk <[2]brentl...@bellsouth.net>
       To: Roman Turovsky <[3]r.turov...@gmail.com>;
     [4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
       Sent: Sunday, 5 February 2012, 17:45
       Subject: [LUTE] P.S. Re: Action on Baroque Lute?

     P.S. It's much appreciated, Roman and Eugene...Indeed, 4 mm was the
     "max" that
     the expert/master luthier told me was "acceptable"...My 10-course was
     in for
     repairs  recently (after 15 years of me playing it...) and the action
     had risen
     to about 5.5 mm at the 9th fret.  The luthier corrected it and it
   plays
     a GREAT
     deal better now.  I am glad to know the same basic rule applies to
   the
     action on
     baroque lutes...Heck, they are lutes, not long-bows to shoot arrows
     with, LOL!
     :-)
     Best regards and have a wonderful Sunday evening,
     BJ
     ----- Original Message ----

     From: Roman Turovsky <[1][5]r.turov...@gmail.com>
     To: [2][6]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; brentlynk
   <[3][7]brentl...@bellsouth.net>
     Sent: Sun, February 5, 2012 12:36:01 PM
     Subject: [LUTE] Re: Action on Baroque Lute?
     3.5mm @ the 8th fret. Definitely no more than 4mm.
     RT
     ----- Original Message ----- From: "brentlynk"

       <[4][8]brentl...@bellsouth.net>
       To: <[5][9]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>

     Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2012 12:27 PM
     Subject: [LUTE] Action on Baroque Lute?
     > Hello Everyone!
     >
     > Quick question to all the experts out there (if it's possible for
   me
     to ask a
     > quick question, LOL -- sorry! :-)
     >
     > What is the "ideal action" at the neck/body joint on 13 course
     baroque lute
     >with
     > a 72 cm vibrating string length "supposed" to be? I realize that
   this
     could be
     > "subjective," based upon individuals and their playing styles,
     etc...But is
     > there a general consensus of a "range" that most people consider
     ideal?
     >
     > IF interested, here is more background as to why I am asking the
     question:
     >
     > I have played ten course renaissance lute for the past 20 years,
   and
     was told
     >by
     > a great luthier that "4 mm of clearance is acceptable at the
     neck/body joint
     >for
     > a 63 cm vibrating string length, 10 course renaissance lute."  He
     also said
     >that
     > on smaller renaissance lutes, such as six course lutes, (especially
     with those
     > with shorter string lengths...) the ideal action is even lower than
     that at
     the
     > neck/body joint -- say, "around 3 mm of clearance at the neck/body
     joint." I
     am
     > NOT a luthier and have no clue...I am only repeating what I was
   told
     by a very
     > reputable luthier who knows his stuff. He gets this newsletter, so
     perhaps
     >he'll
     > answer this question along with others? :-)
     >
     > Anyhow, the reason I ask is that soon, I am going to be blessed
   with
     a 13
     >course
     > baroque lute with a 72 cm vibrating string length, and I am
   wondering
     what the
     > general consensus is on the action for such a lute? Is 4 mm to 5 mm
     of string
     > clearance at the neck/body joint acceptable?  Or is that too low?
   Or
     too high?
     >
     >
     > I realize that we are talking about millimeters here...I don't
     literally mean
     >to
     > splice hairs, LOL :-). I am also wondering if the action on a 13
     course
     baroque
     > lute of 72 cm should/could/would be even higher than 5 mm?
     Personally, having
     > only played renaissance lute up to 10 courses thus far, I have
   always
     preferred
     > the lowest action possible without buzzing...But since the 72 cm,13
     course
     > baroque lute I am referring to is so much longer than what I am
     currently used
     > to with the 10 course, 63 cm lute I play, I want to make sure I
   know
     what to
     > expect... (I am happy to make the transition and adjust
     accordingly...no
     > worries!)
     >
     >
     > Thanks in advance,
     > BJ
     >
     >
     >
     > To get on or off this list see list information at

       > [6][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       --
     References
       1. mailto:[11]r.turov...@gmail.com
       2. mailto:[12]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
       3. mailto:[13]brentl...@bellsouth.net
       4. mailto:[14]brentl...@bellsouth.net
       5. mailto:[15]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
       6. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. mailto:brentl...@bellsouth.net
   3. mailto:r.turov...@gmail.com
   4. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:r.turov...@gmail.com
   6. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   7. mailto:brentl...@bellsouth.net
   8. mailto:brentl...@bellsouth.net
   9. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  11. mailto:r.turov...@gmail.com
  12. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  13. mailto:brentl...@bellsouth.net
  14. mailto:brentl...@bellsouth.net
  15. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to