OK. I’ve taken my protonix but also added “arbiter of what can be posted to the 
lute list” to my list.

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 7:05 AM, Ron Andrico <praelu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>   Danny:
> 
>   We try our best to only post things that are in some way lute-related
>   on this list.  Since this isn't the appropriate forum to respond in
>   detail to your amusingly dyspeptic diatribe, we'll respond in detail on
>   our blog.
> 
>   RA
>     __________________________________________________________________
> 
>   From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu <lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu> on behalf
>   of Daniel Shoskes <kidneykut...@gmail.com>
>   Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 10:47 AM
>   To: Ron Andrico
>   Cc: Lute List
>   Subject: [LUTE] Re: New blog post
> 
>   Well, in your rather ridiculous analogy, the consequences of amateur
>   access to transplants would be graft loss and death. People would pay
>   for the more expensive option to live. People can also tell the
>   difference between "hey look what I can do" amateur performances on
>   youtube and professionals and are willing to pay the professionals for
>   their concerts and recordings. And if they can't tell the difference,
>   they can't. Such a person likely wouldn't have sought out one of your
>   concerts or CDs anyway.
>   So, you have claimed on your blog to be the ultimate arbiter of HIP
>   performance, what should be played and in what order, who is qualified
>   to play it, how society should reimburse for it, what modern rep is
>   acceptable to play and now good vs evil. Since you like to bring
>   politics into your blog posts, this sounds like one of the current US
>   candidates for president (hint: the one that doesn't wear pantsuits (in
>   public)).
>   If someone posts your recordings without your consent on youtube, have
>   them taken down. If you don't like the reimbursement scheme for ads on
>   your videos don't use the ads, or learn how to leverage a youtube
>   channel to promote your career as many have done or don't use youtube.
>   Use vimeo. Boycott youtube. Post videos on your own site behind a
>   paywall. If you prefer surgical analogies, stop constantly whining
>   about the knife sticking in your leg. Pull it out and stitch up the
>   wound.
>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 7:17 PM, Ron Andrico <praelu...@hotmail.com>
>   wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for your response, Danny.  This issue does not have such
>   direct relevance to the lute and its music as Martin's excellent
>   essay.  But it matters because I think it is not an exaggeration that
>   probably every lute enthusiast on this list visits Youtube on a
>   frequent if not regular basis.  It can be the source of enjoyment and a
>   source of information.  But Youtube is also a platform that ultimately
>   runs roughshod over independent artists and diminishes their ability to
>   make a living from their valuable work.
>> 
>> I suspect you may have misconstrued the intent of our post - we
>   weren't asking for money, but rather pointing out that Google/Youtube
>   is indeed evil, and they are really enabling the enormous scale of
>   piracy and copyright violation that's currently going on via Youtube.
>   The fact is, Google/Youtube makes piles of money off the traffic
>   regardless of whether copyright is honored or if it is not, so they
>   have no inclination to care one way or the other.  And like many other
>   facets of modern life, the commonly understood explanation of a given
>   situation differs greatly from reality, and the average person is
>   disinclined to care if it doesn't affect them directly.
>> 
>> Imagine a not-to-distant future where some Uber-type service markets
>   kidney transplants in your own home, and they outsource the service to
>   the hordes of under-qualified medical students clamoring to have a
>   chance to practice their craft. The hospital is no longer relevant, and
>   the fee for slicing and dicing is driven way down.  Details like
>   sanitation and standards of expertise are tossed out the window because
>   the entire experience is all about disruption of the norm and low-cost
>   access to organ meats.  People suffer, professional expertise is
>   ignored and uncompensated and, all the while, the entity making piles
>   of money is the owner of the software that connects butcher with
>   butchee.
>> 
>> I'm not saying that this particular scenario has anything to do with
>   lute-playing, but I am saying that Google/Youtube are raking in piles
>   of money by offering a platform for distribution of copyrighted
>   material and they simply don't care whose rights are being violated.
>   Again, this isn't just about the money - it's about good versus evil.
>> 
>> RA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu <[1]mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
>   <lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu <[2]mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu>> on
>   behalf of Daniel Shoskes <kidneykut...@gmail.com
>   <[3]mailto:kidneykut...@gmail.com>>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 4:23 PM
>> To: Ron Andrico
>> Cc: Lute List
>> Subject: [LUTE] Re: New blog post
>> 
>> I suppose you could rail against big bad Google (owner of youtube)
>   but I doubt that will put food on the table. I actually think a more
>   likely to succeed class action suit would be against the companies that
>   automatically claim that your video of 16th century music violates
>   their copyright for a Justin Bieber song. I just had a battle with one
>   of them that took a month and put me at risk for getting my entire
>   channel shut down.
>> 
>> In any case, if you have a devoted following that wants to support
>   you through your youtube endeavors you might want to consider Patreon.
>   (
>   <applewebdata://3290C547-1C1F-461B-962F-9ED7ABC31AC3>https://www.patreo
>   n.com/home <[4]https://www.patreon.com/home>
>   <https://www.patreon.com/home <[5]https://www.patreon.com/home>>)
>> I have supported artists through this mechanism.
>> 
>>> On Aug 4, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ron Andrico <praelu...@hotmail.com
>   <[6]mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  We have a mid-week blog post that is off-topic but lute-related
>   and of
>>>  peripheral interest to anyone who cares about making a living
>   playing
>>>  the lute and who views YouTube videos, which is probably
>   everyone.
>>> 
>>>  [1]http://wp.me/p15OyV-35G <[7]http://wp.me/p15OyV-35G>
>>> 
>>>  --
>>> 
>>> References
>>> 
>>>  1. [8]http://wp.me/p15OyV-35G <[9]http://wp.me/p15OyV-35G>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>> [10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>   <[11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html>
>> 
>> 
>> --
>   --
> 
>   --
> 
> References
> 
>   Visible links
>   1. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
>   2. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
>   3. mailto:kidneykut...@gmail.com
>   4. https://www.patreon.com/home
>   5. https://www.patreon.com/home
>   6. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
>   7. http://wp.me/p15OyV-35G
>   8. http://wp.me/p15OyV-35G
>   9. http://wp.me/p15OyV-35G
>  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
>   Hidden links:
>  13. file://localhost/net/people/lute-arc/L32746-8418TMP.html
> 



Reply via email to