Am 30.08.2017 um 09:38 schrieb Matthew Daillie <dail...@club-internet.fr>:

> I am surprised, to say the least, by these answers. Are we talking about 
> retuning to just about manage to read through some pieces to get any idea of 
> what they sound like or for serious playing?
> Aren't we totally forgetting the historic recommendation to tune the 
> top-course (in gut) as high as it will go without breaking?
When was it said? In the period of accords nouveaux and later?
What's with the D-major tuning? Tune (or change) 16 strings to hold 3 strings 
(with the chanterelle at its breaking point)?

Best, 
Andreas

> Best,
> Matthew
> 
> 
> 
>> On Aug 30, 2017, at 7:58, Antony M Eastwell <eastwe...@me.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sorry-incomplete message sent by mistake!
>> As I was saying….
>> 
>> I’ve often wondered, and experimented, with retuning a VT 10 course lute 
>> into transitional tunings, and I feel that, as Andreas says, it can be made 
>> to work, and is not as illogical as it sounds. You need to bear in mind the 
>> very sharp upward “tilt” in tension typically found on the highest strings 
>> of instruments in VT. My 10 course (67cms, tuned at A=392, all gut strings) 
>> has course 1  (.42 gut, tension 4.18 kg), and course 2 (.50 gut, tension 
>> 3.32 kg). Courses 3 and 4 are just over 3 kg. Retuning the top two courses 
>> to E and C for Sharp tuning, gives tensions of 2.95 and 2.64 kg. This is not 
>> that far from the tension of courses 3 and 4, and is playable, though not 
>> perhaps ideal. Of course, things are not so good in Flat tuning, but are 
>> still usable IMHO.
>> It’s worth remembering that for one reason or another (nylon??), we often 
>> tune lutes to pitches that are quite high for their string length. We think 
>> of modern G as suitable for the top string of a 60cm lute, but tenor viols 
>> (same basic tuning) are usually in the mid 50’s (and are very often tuned at 
>> 415 as well). My Lacote guitar with a top string at nominal E (let’s not get 
>> onto arguments about C19th pitch!) is only 62.5 cms. I feel that the very 
>> sharp upward scaling of the highest strings on lutes acts as compensation 
>> for the fact that the high pitch of the top strings leaves them without the 
>> mass to move the soundboard properly. Once you lower the pitch, this “mass 
>> compensation” is no longer so necessary, and you get something not so far 
>> from equal tension. I find this feels very relaxing to play on, and though 
>> it take a while to get used to it, it saves a lot of money on gut top 
>> strings!
>> Having said all this, when I made a recording of music from the Wemyss book 
>> some years back, I used two instruments-same string length, but the 6th 
>> course of the lute for the transitional tuning pieces was a tone higher, 
>> thus raising the pitch of the top strings by a tone!
>> 
>> It is worth remembering that the 10 course lute in VT has, I think, the 
>> largest open string range ever used on a single pegbox lute-2 octaves and a 
>> fifth (of a major sixth for some pieces that require a nominal Bb on course 
>> 10). That’s asking a lot of unwound bass strings-if I had been a player, 
>> lute maker, or string maker in the early C17th, I think I would have heaved 
>> a sigh of relief when I discovered the new tunings with their considerably 
>> reduced open string range!
>> 
>> In a number of Ms sources-the Board book, for example, you find a group of 
>> VT pieces in among a predominantly transitional repertoire, and I wonder how 
>> many of the original owners really changed instrument for these pieces.
>> I think we need to experiment before dismissing the idea. Incidentally, it 
>> works much better with gut!
>> 
>> Best wishes
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On 29 Aug 2017, at 16:03, Matthew Daillie <dail...@club-internet.fr> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Well Andreas, I really don't know how you manage to tune your
>>> chanterelle down from g' to eb', for example and your second course
>>> down from d' to c' and still be able to play correctly. I certainly
>>> can't. Gut bass strings are certainly more tolerant of changes of pitch
>>> and can work at different tensions but treble strings are quite another
>>> matter.
>>> Best,
>>> Matthew
>>> On 29/08/2017 16:23, Andreas Schlegel wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm playing since years and years some transitional tunings on my 10c lute, 
>>> norm
>>> ally tuned in VT, without changing any strings - and other accords nouveaux 
>>> lute
>>> types which are normally tuned in the nouvel accord ordinaire (d-minor) 
>>> withopu
>>> t changing any string. And it works.
>>> Of course the feeling changes - but I can handle it.
>>> If I make a concert program, I have normally one instrument in the dedff 
>>> and the
>>> other in edeff and fedff tuning. For the tunings see:
>>> [1]http://www.accordsnouveaux.ch/de/Abhandlung/Accords/Accords_Darstellung/Accor
>>> ds_Darstellung.html
>>> or
>>> [2]http://www.accordsnouveaux.ch/en/styled-5/styled-9/index.html
>>> (the beginning of the translated homepage... the remaining pages and a 
>>> better fo
>>> rmatted design will follow in the next months...)
>>> 
>>> It's simply not thinkable that the lutenists of the transitional period 
>>> restring
>>> ed their lutes for every tuning! So we have to find solutions which are 
>>> near by
>>> the old practice.
>>> 
>>> By the way: With gut strings it's more comfortable to change tunings than 
>>> with m
>>> odern string materials.
>>> 
>>> All the best,
>>> 
>>> Andreas
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> References
>>> 
>>> 1. 
>>> http://www.accordsnouveaux.ch/de/Abhandlung/Accords/Accords_Darstellung/Accords_Darstellung.html
>>> 2. http://www.accordsnouveaux.ch/en/styled-5/styled-9/index.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> 
> 

Andreas Schlegel
Eckstr. 6
CH-5737 Menziken
+41 (0)62 771 47 07
lute.cor...@sunrise.ch


--

Reply via email to