I technically posted an example of quodlibet. But what you've done is
in fact precisely the same as a mashup, wherein two disparate source
pieces are overlaid, often with one source requiring a change of pitch
and/or tempo. Mashups don't mean that you've edited the parts, that
would be more like sampling or looping in digital audio production.
Mashups require that you HAVEN'T EDITED THE PARTS. The mashup as a
genre is only popular in the first place because the "evidence" you're
claiming can be "discovered" with pretty much any two pieces of music,
given matching tempi and key.
It's just that mashups aren't real evidence. The claim you are making
and the manner in which you are making it has precisely the same
academic weight as if you were saying "if you start Pink Floyd's "Dark
Side of the Moon' after the 2nd roar of the MGM lion at the beginning
of The Wizard of Oz, you can clearly see that L. Frank Baum was a HUGE
PINK FLOYD FAN." All you're showing us right now is the result of a
phenomenon called apophenia. Indulging apophenia can be wildly
entertaining and the results may even become a new piece of art in
their own right, but research it is not.
I like that you're thinking about similarities, but I'd just expect
more rigor from someone who says they're a musicologist. I'm sorry, but
even if your claims were correct your mashups on their own still
wouldn't hold any water. Show us actual research that supports your
claims.
But most of all, please stop addressing the list as though we are all
"fools".
Regards,
Jacob Johnson
[uc?export=download&id=0B6_gM3BRE6ZrYVVZZU5QNmJqdDQ&revid=0B6_g
M3BRE6ZraW9nQ2U4SGNwV0tYVWxobnNBVjBsZi9FNHhzPQ]
Guitar/Lute
[1]www.johnsonguitarstudio.com
469.237.0625.
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Tristan von Neumann
<[2]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de> wrote:
it's not a mash-up, I *DID NOT EDIT THE TRACKS!!!!*
I just placed them above each other and pitched the lute to the
pitch of the Raga!
How do you expect to do editing in 30 mins??
here are the original source tracks:
[3]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnbbk7_tFDo
(this reveals the identity of the lutist)
[4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCL2fpacwYA
Am 08.02.2018 um 19:39 schrieb Jacob Johnson:
If a mashup counts as "evidence", then I humbly submit for the
list's
consideration the following:
[1][5]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OYkWSW7u4k&;
#bigiftrue #staywoke #wakeupsheeple
What blows my mind is how incredibly confrontational your tone
is in
nearly everything you post here, Tristan. It's cringey and
strikes me
as condescending.
Jacob Johnson
[uc?export=download&id=0B6_gM3BRE6ZrYVVZZU5QNmJqdDQ&
revid=0B6_g
M3BRE6ZraW9nQ2U4SGNwV0tYVWxobnNBVjBsZi9FNHhzPQ]
Guitar/Lute
[2][6]www.johnsonguitarstudio.com
[3]469.237.0625.
--
References
1. [7]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OYkWSW7u4k&;
2. [8]http://www.johnsonguitarstudio.com/
3. tel:[9](469) 237-0625
To get on or off this list see list information at
[10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
References
1. http://www.johnsonguitarstudio.com/
2. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnbbk7_tFDo
4. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCL2fpacwYA
5. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OYkWSW7u4k&;
6. http://www.johnsonguitarstudio.com/
7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OYkWSW7u4k&;
8. http://www.johnsonguitarstudio.com/
9. tel:(469) 237-0625
10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
