I agree, Rainer, I think it's accepted there's no _perfect_ way to
   introduce meantone or its variants to lute. The trade off of 2 or 3
   cents (which I will barely --if at all-- notice) in a 5th or octave for
   10 cents for nicer thirds is acceptable to me.
   - nb. If one is using gut strings all bets are off after a week or so
   anyway, esp'ly anything above the 5th fret. This related to the age of
   the gut, weather, finger oils, overstrumming/plucking/fingering wear.
   - nb2. The act of pressing or over pressing a digit behind a fret will
   also affect that tuning.
   - nb3. The attempted meantone fretting of fixed fret instruments like
   citterns and orpharions shows that it was given at the very least lip
   service and, at most, worth spending money on and a real pursuit at the
   time.
   To my ear, a gut strung instrument that stays in perfect equal
   temperament for any length of time is equally a chimera. ... unless
   you're wealthy.
   This is my 2 cents and you may continue with your mathematics now.
   Sean

   On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:30 PM, Rainer
   <[1]rads.bera_g...@t-online.de> wrote:

     A clarification:
     Suppose you want to place the frets on a lute so that:
     1) All unisons are pure. That means the f on the second course has
     the same frequency as the open 1. course, the g on the second string
     has the same pitch as the b on the 1. course, ... over all courses.
     2) All octaves are pure. The c on the fourth course has half the
     frequency of the first course, ....
     Then you have no choice left except equal temperament.
     The reason is that lutes cannot be tuned in any meantone
     temperament. You always have to accept false unisons or octaves.
     Rainer
     PS
     I use 1/6 comma meantone. However, I have no Baroque lutes nor have
     I ever tried accord nouveaux...
     On 13.05.2018 21:04, Ralf Mattes wrote:

       Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2018 20:43 CEST, Ron Andrico
     <[2]praelu...@hotmail.com> schrieb:

         Ralf and Rainer, I believe you are in agreement.   Octaves,
     fourths and
         fifths are pure and other intervals are an approximation.

     No, that's not what I (or Rainer) said. And it's wrong: Octaves are
     alway pure in all (western) tuning
     systems. Fifth/forth can be pure but then will be incomensurable
     with octaves (i.e. you can't stack
     fifth/forth and ever end up with pure octaves. As a matter of fact
     no pure intervals are comensurable.
     That IS a mathematic fact).
       Cheers, RalfD

     To get on or off this list see list information at
     [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:rads.bera_g...@t-online.de
   2. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to