Robert Ballard seems to have used thumb in though, as the points show.

And that was after Besard and Dowland.

I think the music always suggests thumb-out, if it was supposed to be
played that way.

If you have passages in the upper part accompanied by deep bass, you
automatically use index-middle-finger, because it's easier to play.

Some tablatures seem to even suggest both techniques in one piece.

The same pieces have different fingerings in different sources sometimes.



On 01.08.19 22:03, Mathias Rösel wrote:
    Well, I've been a member on the list as well. As it seems to me, all
    authors after 1600 who deal with this subject recommend thumb out.
    Vallet even ridicules thumb in.
    We'll never know what player actually did, if they complied with the
    recommendations. Today, research on strings and soundboards points into
    the same direction: thumb out.
    Everybody is free, if course, to do what they like best. Everybody has
    been so, ever since. I don't care. And I don't want to listen to
    players who play the baroque lute thumb in, any more.
    my two cents. just an ordinary member
    Mathias
      __________________________________________________________________

    Gesendet mit der [1]Telekom Mail App
    --- Original-Nachricht ---
    Von: G. C.
    Betreff: [LUTE] Re: RH folk style
    Datum: 01.08.2019, 21:46 Uhr
    An: Lutelist

    Eloquently said Ron, as always!
    G.
    tor. 1. aug. 2019 kl. 21.28 skrev Ron Andrico
    <[1][2]praelu...@hotmail.com>:
    Relax, Howard. No one is on trial here. Perhaps anathema is a
    less
    apt choice to describe alternatives to a right-hand position for
    playing post-1600 repertory on proper lutes. But for all
    intents and
    purposes, thumb-under technique is certainly not an historically
    appropriate right-hand position for what we call baroque lute.
    That is
    not to say it was never used, but Besard (Dowland) and Vallet,
    said it
    in print, and there are countless pictorial representations from
    the
    period that strongly suggest the right-hand thumb was very, very
    much
    out.
    This is a difficult truth to countenance for all those notable
    soldiers
    of the famous 1970s thumb-under brigade, who fought long and
    loudly to
    distinguish themselves from lute-dabbling classical guitarists
    (even to
    the point of eschewing the wearing of the ceremonial black
    turtleneck),
    but it is a truth nonetheless. I'll say it here: Based upon the
    body
    of surviving evidence from the period, lutes with diapasons
    designed to
    be used for post-1600 music were historically intended to be
    played
    with the right-hand thumb out, not under.
    RA
    __________________________________________________________________
    From: [2][3]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
    <[3][4]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu> on behalf of howard
    posner
    <[4][5]howardpos...@ca.rr.com>
    Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2019 5:18 PM
    To: Lutelist <[5][6]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    Subject: [LUTE] Re: RH folk style
    I'm not aware of anyone on this stating categorically that
    thumb-in is
    anathema on the d-minor lute. But I could easily have missed
    it, or
    deleted it and forgotten about it. I tend not to waste time
    dealing
    with categorical statements about how every player in history
    played
    the same way. And if, by chance, I've ever written anything here
    in the
    last 25 years that sounds like a categorical statement about the
    way
    every player, ever, played the same way, chalk it up to sloppy
    writing
    (or thinking), delete it, and forget about it.
    > On Aug 1, 2019, at 9:23 AM, G. C. <[6][7]kalei...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    >
    > People on this list f. ex.?
    To get on or off this list see list information at
    [1][7][8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    --
    References
    1. [8][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    --
    References
    1. mailto:[10]praelu...@hotmail.com
    2. mailto:[11]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
    3. mailto:[12]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
    4. mailto:[13]howardpos...@ca.rr.com
    5. mailto:[14]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
    6. mailto:[15]kalei...@gmail.com
    7. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    8. [17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    --

References

    1. 
https://kommunikationsdienste.t-online.de/redirects/email_app_android_sendmail_footer
    2. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
    3. mailto:lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
    4. mailto:lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
    5. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com
    6. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
    7. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com
    8. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   10. mailto:praelu...@hotmail.com
   11. mailto:lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
   12. mailto:lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
   13. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   14. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   15. mailto:kalei...@gmail.com
   16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




Reply via email to