Dear Monica,

I'm sure you're right, Watteau's interest was the pose not the instrument.

Indeed the same pose was adapted several times about 25 years later [but seen from the front] by Nicolas Lancret, an admirer of Watteau.

http://www2.culture.gouv.fr/Wave/image/joconde/0002/m503604_88ee1503_p.jpg

But the Lancret omits those straining fingers to produce a much more anodyne effect.

Best wishes,

David



At 07:35 +0100 18/7/20, Monica Hall wrote:
Dear David
Thank you for the photo. It does make it much clearer what the player is doing. I tried to take a photo of myself with my guitar - but it didn't work as it is a different shape and the pegs go through the back of the head. I think Watteau must have been more interested in reproducing the striking posture of the player rather than the instrument. This may often be the case with paintings which aren't always a reliable source of information.
Best wishes
Monica



 On 17 July 2020 at 19:20 David Van Edwards <da...@vanedwards.co.uk> wrote:


 Dear Monica,

 There are two separate issues here, the lute and pegbox itself are
 rather odd and dubious and I suspect Watteau didn't really care.

 The position of the hand is a separate matter and it seems entirely
 possible to me. To demonstrate, I've just taken a photo posed in the
 same way as much as possible in the short time you have with a self
 timer!

 > http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/Watteaupose.htm

 It was extra awkward because the half-completed student lute had no
 pegs so I've held one with thumb and first finger. Had there been a
 peg it would have been possible to turn it!

 Best wishes,

 David


 At 17:32 +0100 17/7/20, Monica Hall wrote:
 >I still don't get it!
 >
 >Neither picture seems to make sense to me even when put side to
 >side. In the Lute player the back view of the instrument is shown
 >but the peg box is skewed to the front. The peg box is curved and
 >the pegs inserted laterally.
 >
 >In the Theorbo player the back view of the instrument is shown and
 >the lower peg box is in line with the neck but the upper peg box is
 >skewed to the front.
 >
 >With your left arm stretched out it is almost impossible to get your
 >hand into the position shown. And where is his right arm. Normally
 >you would be plucking the string to hear if it were in tune.
 >Monica
 >
>> On 17 July 2020 at 12:12 David Van Edwards <da...@vanedwards.co.uk> wrote:
 >>
 >>
 >>  Dear Monica,
 >>
 >>  There's another related Watteau painting in the Wallace collection
 >>  (Pour nous prouver que cette belle) showing the same hand in much
 >>  more detail. Different instrument so the pegbox is a bit narrower and
 >>  that maybe makes the hand more possible. But the brushwork here shows
 >>  that Watteau clearly enjoyed the extreme muscularity and effort of
 >>  the fingers which is such a contrast to the languid feeling of the
 >>  rest of the painting. These fingers are in many ways the focal point
 >>  of the painting and the difficulty is the message.
 >>
 >>  I think the other commenters are right, it is the two middle fingers
 >>  holding up the pegbox while the first finger and thumb turn the peg.
 >>  The little finger meanwhile is curled up with the effort.
 >>
 >>  You can see it here thanks to the ArtUK collection.
 >>
 >  >
 > 
>https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/pour-nous-prouver-que-cette-belle-209396/view_as/grid/search/keyword:pour-nous-prouver-que-cette-belle/page/1#
 >>
 >>  Best wishes,
 >>
 >>  David
 >>
 >>  At 10:50 +0100 17/7/20, Monica Hall wrote:
 >>  >"Les charmes de la vie" is a well-known painting by Watteau in the
 >>  >Wallace Collection. You just need to put in the title "Les charmes
 >>  >de la vie" to bring up several examples of it.
 >>  >
 >>  >However, what puzzles me is the odd position of his left arm and
 >>  >hand which seem to me to be anatomically impossible. It looks as if
 > >>  >his fingers are stopping the back of the neck. Even if he was tuning
 >>  >it it couldn't be like that. What do the rest of you think. Am I
 >>  >missing somthing crucial?
 >>  >
 >>  >As ever
 >>  >
 >>  >Monica
 >>  >--
 >>  >
 >>  >To get on or off this list see list information at
 >>  >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 >>
 >>
 >>  --
 >>  The Smokehouse,
 >>  6 Whitwell Road,
>> Norwich, NR1 4HB >> England.
 >>
 >>  Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
 >  > Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk
 >>
 >>


 --
 The Smokehouse,
 6 Whitwell Road,
Norwich, NR1 4HB England.

 Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
 Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk




--
The Smokehouse,
6 Whitwell Road,
Norwich, NR1 4HB England.

Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk


Reply via email to