Dear David
Thank you for this. Seen from in front it is clearer what is happening.
Best wishes
Monica

> On 18 July 2020 at 11:47 David Van Edwards <da...@vanedwards.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Monica,
> 
> I'm sure you're right, Watteau's interest was the pose not the instrument.
> 
> Indeed the same pose was adapted several times about 25 years later 
> [but seen from the front] by Nicolas Lancret, an admirer of Watteau.
> 
> http://www2.culture.gouv.fr/Wave/image/joconde/0002/m503604_88ee1503_p.jpg
> 
> But the Lancret omits those straining fingers to produce a much more 
> anodyne effect.
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> At 07:35 +0100 18/7/20, Monica Hall wrote:
> >Dear David
> >Thank you for the photo. It does make it much clearer what the 
> >player is doing. I tried to take a photo of myself with my guitar - 
> >but it didn't work as it is a different shape and the pegs go 
> >through the back of the head.
> >I think Watteau must have been more interested in reproducing the 
> >striking posture of the player rather than the instrument. This may 
> >often be the case with paintings which aren't always a reliable 
> >source of information.
> >Best wishes
> >Monica
> >
> >
> >
> >>  On 17 July 2020 at 19:20 David Van Edwards <da...@vanedwards.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>  Dear Monica,
> >>
> >>  There are two separate issues here, the lute and pegbox itself are
> >>  rather odd and dubious and I suspect Watteau didn't really care.
> >>
> >>  The position of the hand is a separate matter and it seems entirely
> >>  possible to me. To demonstrate, I've just taken a photo posed in the
> >>  same way as much as possible in the short time you have with a self
> >>  timer!
> >>
> >  > http://www.vanedwards.co.uk/Watteaupose.htm
> >>
> >>  It was extra awkward because the half-completed student lute had no
> >>  pegs so I've held one with thumb and first finger. Had there been a
> >>  peg it would have been possible to turn it!
> >>
> >>  Best wishes,
> >>
> >>  David
> >>
> >>
> >>  At 17:32 +0100 17/7/20, Monica Hall wrote:
> >>  >I still don't get it!
> >>  >
> >>  >Neither picture seems to make sense to me even when put side to
> >>  >side. In the Lute player the back view of the instrument is shown
> >>  >but the peg box is skewed to the front. The peg box is curved and
> >>  >the pegs inserted laterally.
> >>  >
> >>  >In the Theorbo player the back view of the instrument is shown and
> >>  >the lower peg box is in line with the neck but the upper peg box is
> >>  >skewed to the front.
> >>  >
> >>  >With your left arm stretched out it is almost impossible to get your
> >>  >hand into the position shown. And where is his right arm. Normally
> >>  >you would be plucking the string to hear if it were in tune.
> >>  >Monica
> >>  >
> >>  >>  On 17 July 2020 at 12:12 David Van Edwards 
> >><da...@vanedwards.co.uk> wrote:
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  Dear Monica,
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  There's another related Watteau painting in the Wallace collection
> >>  >>  (Pour nous prouver que cette belle) showing the same hand in much
> >>  >>  more detail. Different instrument so the pegbox is a bit narrower and
> >>  >>  that maybe makes the hand more possible. But the brushwork here shows
> >>  >>  that Watteau clearly enjoyed the extreme muscularity and effort of
> >>  >>  the fingers which is such a contrast to the languid feeling of the
> >>  >>  rest of the painting. These fingers are in many ways the focal point
> >>  >>  of the painting and the difficulty is the message.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  I think the other commenters are right, it is the two middle fingers
> >>  >>  holding up the pegbox while the first finger and thumb turn the peg.
> >>  >>  The little finger meanwhile is curled up with the effort.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  You can see it here thanks to the ArtUK collection.
> >>  >>
> >>  >  >
> >  > 
> > >https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/pour-nous-prouver-que-cette-belle-209396/view_as/grid/search/keyword:pour-nous-prouver-que-cette-belle/page/1#
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  Best wishes,
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  David
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  At 10:50 +0100 17/7/20, Monica Hall wrote:
> >>  >>  >"Les charmes de la vie" is a well-known painting by Watteau in the
> >>  >>  >Wallace Collection. You just need to put in the title "Les charmes
> >>  >>  >de la vie" to bring up several examples of it.
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >However, what puzzles me is the odd position of his left arm and
> >>  >>  >hand which seem to me to be anatomically impossible. It looks as if
> >  > >>  >his fingers are stopping the back of the neck. Even if he was tuning
> >>  >>  >it it couldn't be like that. What do the rest of you think. Am I
> >>  >>  >missing somthing crucial?
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >As ever
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >Monica
> >>  >>  >--
> >>  >>  >
> >>  >>  >To get on or off this list see list information at
> >>  >>  >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  --
> >>  >>  The Smokehouse,
> >>  >>  6 Whitwell Road,
> >>  >>  Norwich,  NR1 4HB    
> >>  >>  England.
> >>  >>
> >>  >>  Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
> >>  >  > Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk
> >>  >>
> >>  >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  --
> >>  The Smokehouse,
> >>  6 Whitwell Road,
> >>  Norwich,  NR1 4HB     
> >>  England.
> >>
> >>  Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
> >>  Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
> -- 
> The Smokehouse,
> 6 Whitwell Road,
> Norwich,  NR1 4HB      
> England.
> 
> Telephone: + 44 (0)1603 629899
> Website: http://www.vanedwards.co.uk
> 
>


Reply via email to