I think we're coming to the end of this thread and I'd like to thank
   everyone for their myriad facts and insights.
   best wishes, Sean

   On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 7:47 AM MJ Hodgson <[1]mjhodg...@hotmail.co.uk>
   wrote:

        Movable type was indeed a factor - though some printers also
     employed a
        type face with the lines incorporated.
        The point is that writing tablature ms on lines was a common
     general
        practice earlier in the sixteenth century and then, of course,
     became
        general after the opening decades of the seventeenth.

     __________________________________________________________________
        From: [2]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
        <[3]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu> on behalf of Tristan
     von
        Neumann <[4]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de>
        Sent: 04 August 2020 15:22
        To: [5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu <[6]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
        Subject: [LUTE] Re: Tablature letters on lines - was Re: e vs c
        It seems to me that moveable type doesn't seem to have anything
     to do
        with the decision.
        The types with the line already included (as in scores) are
     on-line
        (Phalèse).
        If you print in two steps with the lines first then the letters,
        above-line seems more common, maybe easier to align.
        On 04.08.20 09:52, Martyn Hodgson wrote:
        >      Dear Martin,
        >      I agree that the supposed low case 'r' is merely an
     earlier way
        of
        >      writing 'c'.   However I'm not one with you on writing
     tablature
        letters
        >      in the spaces rather than on the lines.
        >      Writing on the lines is generally the earlier form and,
     indeed,
        >      persisted through to the instrument's decline: the
     practice of
        setting
        >      the letters in the spaces seems to have appeared when
     movable
        type was
        >      employed (though not universally).
        >      In practice I far prefer the more common historical
     practice
        (almost
        >      universal from the seventeenth century for engraved music
     as well
        as
        >      ms)) of writing on the lines - a big advantage is that
     even with
        quite
        >      a narrow system the letters can still be reasonably large
     by
        extending
        >      into the neighboring lines without interfering with ease
     of
        recognition
        >      of the 'home' line. Tablature letter 'f' is a good
     example.
        >      regards
        >      Martyn
        >
        >      On Tuesday, 4 August 2020, 07:36:56 BST, Martin Shepherd
        >      <[7]mar...@luteshop.co.uk> wrote:
        >      The "r" is in most English lute MSS and in all the lute
     song
        prints as
        >      well. In fact it's not an "r" at all, just another way of
     writing
        "c".
        >      My biggest readability complaint is writing the letters on
     the
        lines
        >      rather than between them - a habit which seems to have
     become
        quite
        >      common with some modern editors of lute music. And just to
     open
        up a
        >      few
        >      more worms, I find French tablature very convenient
     because
        (although I
        >      read all kinds of tab fluently) I can write in fingerings,
     which
        can
        >      get
        >      very confusing in Italian tab.
        >      M
        >      On 04/08/2020 02:27, T.J. Sellari wrote:
        >      >     ---------- Forwarded message ---------
        >      >     From: Tristan von Neumann
     <[1][1][8]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de>
        >      >     Date: Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:14 AM
        >      >     Subject: [LUTE] Re: e vs c
        >      >     To: [2][2][9]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        <[3][3][10]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
        >      >     Ah yes. I forgot about those.
        >      >     I hate English prints. As if they were deliberately
     trying
        to make
        >      >     things unreadable.
        >      >     Morlaye is the best imho.
        >      >     On 04.08.20 01:30, Denys Stephens wrote:
        >      >     > Dear Sean & Tristan, the Robert Dowland ÃÆ
     ¢Varietie of
        lute
        >      lessons'
        >      >     and Barley's ÃÆ ¢New book of tablature' both have ÃÆ
     ¢r' for
        ÃÆ ¢c'
        >      although the
        >      >     latter is engraved rather than typeset. I suspect
     that the
        >      Varietie of
        >      >     lute lessons may have had an undue influence in
     modern times
        >      because it
        >      >     was the first facsimile that many of us who were
     involved in
        lute
        >      music
        >      >     in those days owned in the Scott edition.
        >      >     > Best wishes, Denys
        >      >     >
        >      >     > Sent from my iPhone
        >      >     >
        >      >     >> On 4 Aug 2020, at 00:02, Tristan von Neumann
        >      >     <[4][4][11]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de> wrote:
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >> Good question Sean...
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >> I think there's no real development in this.
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >> For example, Fuhrmann's Testudo Gallica&Germanica
     uses
        >      "on-line"
        >      >     fonts,
        >      >     >> and "c".
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >> This is very annoying sometimes if you want to
     play from
        the
        >      >     facsimile...
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >> In manuscripts, Marsh Lute Book uses c, it's
     often very
        >      confusing
        >      >     next
        >      >     >> to the e.
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >> French "above line" prints from earlier decades
     (Morlaye,
        Le
        >      Roy)
        >      >     also
        >      >     >> use c but I find those prints very readable.
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >> I don't recall "r" in prints, but maybe I missed
     some.
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >>
        >      >     >>> On 04.08.20 00:56, Sean Smith wrote:
        >      >     >>>       Dear all,
        >      >     >>>       There's a long tradition of scribing the
     cipher 'r'
        in
        >      place
        >      >     of 'c' in
        >      >     >>>       manuscripts of lute tablature. It's quick
     and easy
        and
        >      serves
        >      >     to
        >      >     >>>       differentiate a 'c' from an 'e'. My
     question is,
        did this
        >      >     carry over
        >      >     >>>       into historic printed tablatures with
     standardized
        >      typefaces?
        >      >     Can
        >      >     >>>       anyone suggest examples? Lute, guitar,
     mandora,
        etc?
        >      >     >>>       I don't recall any in Renaissance
     prints--tho I
        could
        >      easily
        >      >     be
        >      >     >>>       wrong--but I know I don't have enough
     experience
        with
        >      baroque
        >      >     >>>       tablatures!
        >      >     >>>       Tia, Sean
        >      >     >>>
        >      >     >>>       --
        >      >     >>>
        >      >     >>>
        >      >     >>> To get on or off this list see list information
     at
        >      >     >>>
        [5][5][12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        >      >     >>
        >      >     Actually, the letter that looks like an "r" is
     actually a
        "c" in
        >      >     English secretary hand. That's probably why the "r"
     is
        featured in
        >      >     English sources.
        >      >     If you scroll down to the chart of miniscule letters
     here
        >      >
        >

     [6][6][13]http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleograph
     y-for-e
        >      ver
        >      >     yone-cracking-old.html you'll see various form(s) of
     c.
        >      >     Tom
        >      >
        >      >     --
        >      >
        >      > References
        >      >
        >      >     1. mailto:[7][14]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        >      >     2. mailto:[8][15]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        >      >     3. mailto:[9][16]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        >      >     4. mailto:[10][17]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        >      >     5.
        [11][18]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        >      >     6.
        >

     [12][19]http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-
     for-eve
        >      ryone-cracking-old.html
        >      >
        >      --
        >      This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
        software.
        >      [13][20]https://www.avast.com/antivirus
        >
        >      --
        >
        > References
        >
        >      1. [1]mailto:[21]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        >      2. [2]mailto:[22]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        >      3. [3]mailto:[23]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        >      4. [4]mailto:[24]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        >      5.
     [5][25]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        >      6.

     [6][26]http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-f
     or-ever
        >      7. [7]mailto:[27]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        >      8. [8]mailto:[28]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        >      9. [9]mailto:[29]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        >     10. [10]mailto:[30]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        >     11.
     [11][31]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        >     12.

     [12][32]http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-
     for-eve
        ryone-cracking-old.html
        >     13. [13][33]https://www.avast.com/antivirus
        >
        Virus-free. [14][34]www.avast.com
        --
     References
        Visible links:
        1. mailto:[35]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        2. mailto:[36]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        3. mailto:[37]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        4. mailto:[38]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        5. [39]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
        6.
     [40]http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-
     ever
        7. mailto:[41]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
        8. mailto:[42]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
        9. mailto:[43]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
       10. mailto:[44]tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
       11. [45]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
       12.
     [46]http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-
     everyone-cracking-old.html
       13. [47]https://www.avast.com/antivirus
       14.
     [48]https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link
     &utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
        Hidden links:
       16.
     [49]https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link
     &utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
       17.
     file://localhost/net/ifs-users/lute-arc/L1742571-3862TMP.html#DAB4FA
     D8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2

   --

References

   1. mailto:mjhodg...@hotmail.co.uk
   2. mailto:lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. mailto:lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
   5. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   7. mailto:mar...@luteshop.co.uk
   8. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
   9. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  13. http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-e
  14. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  15. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  16. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  17. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  18. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  19. http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-eve
  20. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
  21. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  22. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  23. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  24. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  25. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  26. http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-ever
  27. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  28. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  29. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  30. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  31. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  32. http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-eve
  33. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
  34. http://www.avast.com/
  35. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  36. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  37. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  38. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  39. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  40. http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-ever
  41. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  42. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  43. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  44. mailto:tristanvonneum...@gmx.de
  45. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  46. 
http://morristownnhpmuseum.blogspot.com/2016/10/paleography-for-everyone-cracking-old.html
  47. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
  48. 
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
  49. 
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to