Erik Christiansen wrote:
> On 10.04.13 04:48, James Harper wrote:
>> The MTBF for the disk is given as 1000000 hours, while most other
>> ...........snip
> There are not many hours in a year, so 3 years is little compared to
> 10^6 hours. (That 114 year MTBF is quite impressive.) It does though
> halve for each 10°C rise above the temperature at which the lifetime is
> predicted.
Would the converse hold true ie. doubling for each 10°C fall bellow the
temperature at which the lifetime is predicted?
and
"Running at 80°C above nominal for 6 months is equivalent to
128 years of life.)" would imply the test was conducted at 0°C;
is this standard or just for example?
regards Rohan McLeod
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
