Russell Coker <[email protected]> wrote: > I've got a BTRFS filesystem that was corrupted by a RAM error (I discarded a > DIMM after doing all the relevant Memtest86+ tests). Currently I have been > unable to get btrfsck to work on it and make it usable again. But at least I > know the data was corrupted which is better than having the system keep going > and make things worse.
Agreed. Is development effort being devoted to Btrfsck at the moment? I know it was long delayed and still not considered complete when released, but that was quite a while ago. I also know that online fsck is among their longer-term project objectives, since a full off-line scan and repair of today's high-capacity drives is considered unacceptably time-consuming in some environments. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
