On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 04:01:45 AM Rick Moen wrote: > [a great deal of energetically missing the point, snipped]
No I'm just making a point that you want to ignore. > > The Linux kernel is much larger than systemd and has many more > > interfaces to sources of hostile data. > > The security problem primarily raised by systemd has very little to do > with the init or its ancillary and unneccessary daemons (hostnamed, Which is still a minor issue compared to web browsers, MUAs, and other programs which directly and predictably accept data from potentially hostile sources. On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 07:44:29 AM Peter Ross wrote: > I find your argumentation quite weird.. "even if there is an issue, there > are others in the system". With your background, it is certainly > astonishing. > > If there is a problem with a flimsy door lock it does not matter whether > the windows are secured by metal bar. The burglar looks for weak spots. Where the flimsy door lock is your typical web browser or MUA and systemd is a window that has bars that aren't as thick as you like. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
