On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:16:22PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:54:41PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:33:52PM +0200, Deon van der Merwe wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Been using this setup on at least 4 different installations without > > > > this > > > > issue... we have multiple virtual services and use iptables MARK to tag > > > > the packets for each virtual service. > > > > > > > > My problem is that when I enable/configure persistence on IPVS the > > > > client gets "connection refused". The same config *without* > > > > persistence > > > > works fine. > > > > > > Hi Deon, > > > > > > that looks very odd. I've been able to reproduce the problem here > > > with 2.6.30. But its getting a bit late in the day for me to debug it. > > > I'll try and get a chance to do so shortly if no one else gets > > > there first. > > Hm, your change in 2.6.30 should fix this problem: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=be8be9eccbf2d908a7e56b3f7a71105cd88da06b > > looking at > > kernel: IPVS: template lookup/in IP 160.124.109.65:0->0.0.0.0:0 not hit > > daddr=0.0.0.0 shows that fwmark is not provided at the > right place, so the user just needs to upgrade or to apply > the patch from May, 2009: > > http://marc.info/?t=124050022700001&r=1&w=2
Hi Julian, I've been able to reproduce the problem that Deon reported with 2.6.30, which includes the change above, so I think that it is a separate problem. That said, Deon also needs to change above, "ipvs: Fix IPv4 FWMARK virtual services", as he is using more than one fwmark. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
