On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:37:32AM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > looking at > > > > > > kernel: IPVS: template lookup/in IP 160.124.109.65:0->0.0.0.0:0 not hit > > > > > > daddr=0.0.0.0 shows that fwmark is not provided at the > > > right place, so the user just needs to upgrade or to apply > > > the patch from May, 2009: > > > > > > http://marc.info/?t=124050022700001&r=1&w=2 > > > > Hi Julian, > > > > I've been able to reproduce the problem that Deon reported > > with 2.6.30, which includes the change above, so I think > > that it is a separate problem. > > It is still not clear to me whether Deon needed just 2.6.30 > or your latest change was needed. I don't see how ipvsadm 1.25 > can provide virtual port without -t/-u options. What is your > ipvsadm command line that reproduces this svc port problem in > 2.6.30? May be you have both -f and -t/-u ?
>From memory, I simply tried something like: ipvsadm -A -t 1 ipvsadm -a -t 1 -r 10.0.0.1:80 and then later ipvsadm -A -t 1 ipvsadm -a -t 1 -r 10.0.0.1:0 I'll try and retest this. > > That said, Deon also needs to change above, "ipvs: Fix IPv4 FWMARK virtual > > services", as he is using more than one fwmark. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
