Wlc is the balancer method.... You could choose between others... Like wrr well you got 150 again??
It seens you are using 2 servers to run ab. I will look into it closer later im on my phone... ----- Original message ----- > Please find the latest stats > > [r...@dr01 ha.d]# ipvsadm -L -n > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn >InActConn > TCP 192.168.16.183:8080 wlc > -> 192.168.16.178:8080 Route 1 100 > 5129 > -> 192.168.16.176:8080 Route 1 100 > 5116 > -> 192.168.16.177:8080 Route 1 100 > 5117 > [r...@dr01 ha.d]# ipvsadm -L -n --stats > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > Prot LocalAddress:Port Conns InPkts > OutPkts InBytes > OutBytes > -> RemoteAddress:Port > TCP 192.168.16.183:8080 22106 154555 > 0 26451062 > 0 > -> 192.168.16.178:8080 7377 51598 > 0 8828089 > 0 > -> 192.168.16.176:8080 7374 51578 > 0 8824550 > 0 > -> 192.168.16.177:8080 7355 51379 > 0 8798423 > 0 > [r...@dr01 ha.d]# ipvsadm -L -n --rate > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > Prot LocalAddress:Port CPS InPPS > OutPPS InBPS > OutBPS > -> RemoteAddress:Port > TCP 192.168.16.183:8080 19 150 > 0 23312 > 0 > -> 192.168.16.178:8080 6 50 > 0 7775 > 0 > -> 192.168.16.176:8080 6 50 > 0 7741 > 0 > -> 192.168.16.177:8080 6 50 > 0 7796 > 0 > > [r...@dr01 ha.d]# ipvsadm -L -n --connection > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > IPVS connection entries > pro expire state source virtual > destination > TCP 00:22 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:56447 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:16 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:60102 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.178:8080 > TCP 00:12 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55531 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.178:8080 > TCP 00:03 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:58875 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:22 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:56341 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:17 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55922 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.178:8080 > TCP 00:05 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:54851 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:20 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:56227 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.178:8080 > TCP 00:00 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:54475 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:18 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:60300 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.178:8080 > TCP 00:18 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55993 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:17 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55956 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:11 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55404 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:06 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:59238 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:18 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:60293 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:16 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55866 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:17 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55905 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:24 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:60891 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:20 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:60458 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.178:8080 > TCP 00:12 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:55486 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:06 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:59241 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > TCP 00:01 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.244:54504 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.176:8080 > TCP 00:14 FIN_WAIT 10.84.53.243:59877 192.168.16.183:8080 > 192.168.16.177:8080 > I am not clear about the question on wlc and ipvs. > > Regards, > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Henrique Fernandes > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > When you give ab to 192.168.16.183:8080 it does not get 450 > > connections ? > > > > Do this: > > > > #ipvsadm --zero > > > > Check to see if stats is zero for each server. > > > > Now use ab to server 192.168.16.183:8080 while the test are being use, > > see --conections, try to get like more than once. > > > > after test over, use --stats and post here again! > > > > I guess as you are seeing you can figureout > > > > By the way, is a choise of your to use wlc balancer and route in ipvs > > ? > > > > > > > > > > []'sf.rique > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Anil Pillai <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Below is the the output of commands. > > > > > > > > > [r...@dr01 ~]# ipvsadm -L -n > > > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > > > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > > > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn > > > InActConn > > > TCP 192.168.16.183:8080 wlc > > > -> 192.168.16.178:8080 Route 1 0 > > > 59 > > > -> 192.168.16.176:8080 Route 1 0 > > > 59 > > > -> 192.168.16.177:8080 Route 1 0 > > > 81 > > > > > > [r...@dr01 ~]# ipvsadm -L -n --stats > > > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > > > Prot LocalAddress:Port Conns InPkts > > > OutPkts InBytes > > > OutBytes > > > -> RemoteAddress:Port > > > TCP 192.168.16.183:8080 23514 164005 > > > 0 23122438 > > > 0 > > > -> 192.168.16.178:8080 8532 59554 > > > 0 8380480 > > > 0 > > > -> 192.168.16.176:8080 7628 53138 > > > 0 7459184 > > > 0 > > > -> 192.168.16.177:8080 7354 51313 > > > 0 7282774 > > > 0 > > > > > > [r...@dr01 ~]# ipvsadm -L -n --connection > > > IPVS connection entries > > > pro expire state source virtual > > > > > > destination > > > > > > --connection, didn;t give any output. > > > > > > Yes, i get 150 on each server when tested simultaneously. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Henrique Fernandes > > > <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Can you please post the outputs of this comands in the diretord. > > > > > > > > #ipvsadm -L -n > > > > > > > > #ipvsadm -L --n --stats > > > > > > > > #ipvsadm -L -n --connection > > > > > > > > > > > > And if you use ab to test both servers at same time you get 150 on > > > > each > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > []'sf.rique > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Anil Pillai <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I have a LVS/DR setup (ldirectord) with One Director and two Real > > > > Servers. > > > > > On Real Servers i have Apache Webserver running on port 8080. > > > > > Each Apache is capable of serving 150 TPS. > > > > > Now when i did load testing via Virtual IP, i am still getting > > > > > same > > TPS > > > > > (150). > > > > > For load testing i have used apache benckmark (ab) tool. > > > > > As per my understanding via Load Balancer (VIP) TPS should > > > > > increase > > and > > > > > should get around 300 TPS. > > > > > > > > > > Not sure where i am going wrong. Can anyone help me on this ? > > > > > > > > > > Below is the Setup Details: > > > > > > > > > > Director (Just acts as director only): > > > > > > > > > > 10.50.57.55 -> Virtual IP > > > > > 10.50.57.45 -> Physical IP > > > > > > > > > > Real Server 1: > > > > > 10.50.57.22 -> Physical IP on eth0 > > > > > lo:0 Link encap:Local Loopback > > > > > > > > > > inet addr:10.50.57.55 Mask:255.255.255.255 > > > > > > > > > > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > > > > > > > > > > Real Server 2: > > > > > 10.50.57.23 -> Physical IP on eth0 > > > > > lo:0 Link encap:Local Loopback > > > > > > > > > > inet addr:10.50.57.55 Mask:255.255.255.255 > > > > > > > > > > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > > > > > > > > > > # Global Directives > > > > > checktimeout=3 > > > > > checkinterval=6 > > > > > autoreload=yes > > > > > logfile="/var/log/ldirectord.log" > > > > > quiescent=yes > > > > > # HTTP services > > > > > virtual=10.50.57.55:8080 > > > > > service=http > > > > > scheduler=rr > > > > > protocol=tcp > > > > > checktype=negotiate > > > > > real=10.50.57.22:8080 > > > > > real=10.50.57.23:8080 > > > > > request="test/lvs.html" > > > > > receive="Test Page" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Added Below line in sysctl.conf on Real Servers: > > > > > net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_ignore = 1 > > > > > net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_announce = 2 > > > > > net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore = 1 > > > > > net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_announce = 2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > > > > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > > > > > > > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > [email protected] > > > > > Send requests to [email protected] > > > > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > > > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > > > > > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > > > [email protected] Send requests to > > > > [email protected] or go to > > > > http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > > > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - > > > [email protected] Send requests to > > > [email protected] or go to > > > http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > > Send requests to [email protected] > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] > Send requests to [email protected] > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [email protected] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
