On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Stefan Bauer wrote: > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> > > Traditionally IPVS-NAT has worked in the form of destination-NAT, > > that is modifying the destination IP address to that of the real-server. > > This works well for in a wide range of circumstances. > > > > More recently Full NAT support was added. This modifies > > source IP address to that of the linux-director as well > > as the destination IP address to that of the selected real-server. > > So the linux-director does not have to be the default-gw for the real-servers > anymore with Full-NAT?
Return packets still need to travel through the linux-director as the Full-NAT as the address translations need to be reversed. > > An example of where full NAT may be useful is if a real-server wants to > > access a virtual service handled by the linux-director of the real-server. > > Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
