On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 05:05:51PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:42:25AM +0100, Stefan Bauer wrote: > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> > > > Traditionally IPVS-NAT has worked in the form of destination-NAT, > > > that is modifying the destination IP address to that of the real-server. > > > This works well for in a wide range of circumstances. > > > > > > More recently Full NAT support was added. This modifies > > > source IP address to that of the linux-director as well > > > as the destination IP address to that of the selected real-server. > > > > So the linux-director does not have to be the default-gw for the > > real-servers anymore with Full-NAT? > > Return packets still need to travel through the linux-director > as the Full-NAT as the address translations need to be reversed.
Sorry, I missed your point. As the return packets will be addressed to the linux-director I think that you are correct and that a default (or other) route via the linux-director should not be necessary. > > > An example of where full NAT may be useful is if a real-server wants to > > > access a virtual service handled by the linux-director of the real-server. > > > > Stefan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
