Yes: I saw it only sends LLDP frames in regular intervals. >From what I know about LLDP (I implemented a Profinet CC-B device where LLDP is mandatory), an "LLDP implementation" also needs to receive LLDP frames and present the received neighborhood info via SNMP LLDP MIBs. This is way more work than just sending LLDP frames.
So IMHO, your LLDP implementation is not that useful - or am I wrong with my assumption about LLDP reception? Are there use cases where sending LLDP frames is enough? Ciao Dirk -- Dirk Ziegelmeier * [email protected] * http://www.ziegelmeier.net On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Amit Ashara <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello All > > Did anyone have a look at the lldp code base? > > Regards > Amit Ashara > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Amit Ashara <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> The Manifest has been updated now and the new package is available for >> download. >> >> http://www.ti.com/lit/zip/spmc023 >> >> Regards >> Amit Ashara >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Amit Ashara <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hello Simon, >>> >>> The issue was with the License Option that we had used. The same is >>> being now under correction and I would upload a new package with the >>> correct License file. >>> >>> Regards >>> Amit Ashara >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Amit Ashara <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Simon >>>> >>>> Thanks for the quick feedback. I am clarifying the same with the Legal >>>> team. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Amit Ashara >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Simon Goldschmidt <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Amit Ashara wrote: >>>>> > The LLDP package is now online at the following link >>>>> > http://www.ti.com/lit/zip/spmc023 >>>>> > There is a short ReadMe on integrating the LLDP into the LwIP and >>>>> the application layer. I hope it is useful for others. >>>>> >>>>> Excerpt from the docx in the zip: >>>>> >>>>> "any redistribution and use of the source code, including any resulting >>>>> derivative works, are licensed by TI for use only with TI Devices" >>>>> >>>>> Being like that, I can't even have a look at the sources... :-( >>>>> Interestingly, the source code files have a different license included >>>>> ;-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Simon >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lwip-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
