Hi,
First of all great that you have been able to leap to 2.xx 😊 Keeping the connection open or not depends on your own needs. So there is no simple reply to that. As for buffering, it depends on your system design. Do you have an OS or are you running without an OS, do you have sufficient RAM to create the buffering etc... Do remember that while using RAW API, sending data not from the TCP own context is not thread safe, that is if you use threads. If you use an OS, one way is to use the poll call back and send all the data in the buffer from within the poll call back. Meaning you add data to the buffer from one task and let the poll call back check if that buffer has data to. This is a bit slow but easy to keep an eye... To properly handle the data send you need to keep an eye on send window size etc.. I suggest checking the examples in the contribution section and especially the HTTP server were you can see how you can send data and keep an eye on how much you can send. Another option that will be faster, is to create a call back function and call it from within the tcp context by calling the sys_timeout function. This way you set the timeout from your own code and when it is triggered it calls your function. Your function will access the buffer or what other mechanism you use. You can also use the sent call back to send more data when the last chunk was already sent, that is if the buffer has more data to be sent. I suggest first to think what you want to achieve and then design how. Hope the above gave some ideas and helped. BR, Noam. ________________________________ From: lwip-users <lwip-users-bounces+noam=silrd....@nongnu.org> on behalf of mitchj <mit...@cirris.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 9:06 PM To: lwip-users@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [lwip-users] A new users request for help with sending TCP Packets on Demand Thank you, I have read that page, and actually lept ahead to 2.0.0, it was an easier upgrade than I expected. Further, I was able to get a basic example working sending a string through a client. For now I have only a couple of questions to help me in my design. I need to expand this so that I can send data from anywhere in my full application. So first off: Is it best to attempt to keep the connection awake, or should this connection be closed and opened for each transaction? Further, with a client is there an equivalent of an accept callback that could open the connection when the server decides to push data to the client? ... I'm probably revealing how new I am at this. Second: How might some of you recommend queuing data to be sent from outside of the lwip client. As in, my application wants to send data to the server, how should it get that data into the client? I was thinking I'd write a function that took raw data and added it to a buffer chain or something like that. Am I on the wrong path? Regards, -- View this message in context: http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/A-new-users-request-for-help-with-sending-TCP-Packets-on-Demand-tp29868p29984.html lwip-users - A new users request for help with sending TCP Packets on Demand<http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/A-new-users-request-for-help-with-sending-TCP-Packets-on-Demand-tp29868p29984.html> lwip.100.n7.nabble.com A new users request for help with sending TCP Packets on Demand. Hi there lwip users, I've had success sending UDP packets on demand, but am not finding success doing the same with a TCP... Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users lwip-users Info Page - non-GNU<https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users> lists.nongnu.org Welcome to the lwip-users mailing list. Use it to ask questions, share your experience and discuss new ideas. To see the collection of prior postings to the list ...
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
